On 17 July 2024, the King announced a new Renters’ Rights Bill  (“RRB”) to be introduced “to give greater rights and protections to people renting their homes...”  The RRB has not yet been published however the background briefing note to the King’s speech indicates that the RRB largely resurrects the Conservatives’ Renters (Reform) Bill that did not survive the July snap election. The headline points remain the same: Section 21 “no fault” eviction procedure to be abolished Eviction grounds to be expanded Decent Homes Standard to be applied to the private rented sector Fines on landlords for breaching the new rules Tenants able to challenge above-market rent increases Local Council’s enforcement powers to be strengthened to drive out ‘bad’ landlords National landlord database Introduction of a Property Ombudsman to resolve tenants’ complaints No unreasonable refusal to allow pets Illegal for landlords to discriminate against tenants on benefits or with children

As schools prepared to reopen this September after the summer break, hundreds were informed that, due to the use of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) in their buildings (and its current state and condition), this would not be the case and they would need to remain closed or find alternative accommodation until remedial works could be undertaken.  There are likely to be further closures in the future, as more schools are found to contain RAAC in need of urgent remedial works. It has recently become apparent that other buildings have been also affected by RAAC issues, for example court buildings and hospitals. This Insight takes a closer look at RAAC, why it has become an issue now and considers practical steps for those affected by RAAC.

Last year the Upper Tribunal held that holders of concurrent leases that are subject to pre-existing Telecoms Code agreements cannot be treated as a ‘party to the agreement’, effectively sterilising their ability to terminate or modify/renew those Code agreements. Concurrent leaseholders requiring the removal or relocation of telecommunications equipment to facilitate a development were particularly badly affected, as they were left at the mercy of the operators, or faced with costly revisions to adapt their scheme around the apparatus and associated rights. The Court of Appeal has unanimously overturned the Upper Tribunal’s decision, bringing welcome relief and clarity for both site providers and telecoms operators.

In this quarter’s edition, we cover cases concerning continuing nuisance, business lease renewals, “subject to contract” and misrepresentation.  We also tell you about the new Renters (Reform) Bill recently introduced to Parliament.