Insights

Briefcase 2024 Quarter 4: Key Real Estate Cases and Updates

Briefcase 2024 Quarter 4: Key Real Estate Cases and Updates

Dec 19, 2024
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Telecoms tower

Case 1: AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd v On Tower UK Ltd

Mast confusion: A telecoms lease v licence debate

In a landmark judgment, the Upper Tribunal considers the lease/licence distinction, clarifying exclusive possession, term certain and contractual interpretation in the context of Code agreements.

Read more >

Padlocked door

Case 2: Sunnymeads Motor Company v Tolfree-Cross & Another

Third-time (un)lucky? Court considers if a tenant brought its business lease renewal claim in time

A business tenant, whose lease renewal claim was issued more than a week after the statutory deadline, is thrown a lifeline by the High Court.

Read more >

Building with a rooftop garden

Case 3: Nicholas Alexander Blomfield and others v Monier Road Limited

First-Tier Tribunal considers what counts as a “storey” in higher-risk buildings

The First-Tier Tribunal considered that a roof garden was a “storey” when assessing whether a building is higher-risk under the BSA, which contradicts Government-issued guidance.

Read more >

Two parties signing a contract

Case 4: The Pentagon Food Group & Ors v B Cadman Ltd

So that’s settled, then? Revisiting without prejudice discussions when considering implied terms and misrepresentation in settlement agreements

Can a party enforce or challenge the terms of a settlement agreement where the counterparty allegedly misrepresented its ability to bring the settlement into effect during without prejudice negotiations?

Read more >

Building with an offices to let board attached to its wall

Legal Update: The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

Law Commission publishes long awaited consultation on business tenancies

In its 70th anniversary year, the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 is under full scrutiny, as the Law Commission seeks views on the appropriate model and scope of security of tenure.

Read more >

This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.