David H. Holmberg

""
  1. People /

David H. Holmberg

David H. Holmberg

Partner

""
  1. People /

David H. Holmberg

David H. Holmberg

Partner

David H. Holmberg

Partner

New York

T: +1 212 541 2170

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Biography

David advises on the tax aspects of complex commercial transactions. He focuses on real estate private equity, including direct lending and distressed strategies. David also has significant experience with public and private REITs and cross-border engagements. 

Prior to joining BCLP, David worked as Counsel at another large international law firm. He was also a Chief Counsel Honors Program Intern at the Internal Revenue Service, Office of the Chief Counsel, in New York.

Professional Affiliations

  • Member, Phi Beta Kappa
  • Intern, Chief Counsel Honors Program, Office of the Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.

Admissions

  • New York, 2015

Education

  • New York University-School of Law, J.D., 2014
  • University of California-Berkeley, B.A., with distinction, 2010

Related Practice Areas

  • Tax Advice & Controversy

  • Real Estate

  • Commercial Real Estate

  • Tax & Private Client

  • M&A & Corporate Finance

  • Private Equity

  • Real Estate Private Equity, Investments & REITs

  • Taxation of Corporate Transactions

  • Taxation of Financial Transactions & Institutions

  • Real Estate Tax

  • Corporate

  • Energy Transition

  • Distressed Real Estate

Related Insights

Insights
Jan 29, 2024

Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption

*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.

Related Insights

News
May 09, 2024
BCLP Attorneys Argue for Broader Interpretation of Important FIRPTA Exception
Insights
Jan 29, 2024
Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption
*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.
News
Nov 13, 2023
BCLP’s Tax Practice gets boost with new partner