Antitrust

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Overview

Our leading Antitrust & Competition practice includes over 75 dedicated lawyers located in 15 offices across the US, UK, Belgium, France and Germany. Our significant global coverage is combined with intimate local knowledge of markets and regulatory regimes. Whether your issue is international or domestic, we will provide the strategic insight necessary to help you manage antitrust and competition law risk and at the same time achieve your commercial objectives. Our team provides commercially-focused, full-service competition and regulatory support to clients, ranging from compliance policies and training to cartel investigations and merger controlThe experience of our team is substantive and diverse – in private practice, in industry, at regulators, in economics and in law. We are well-equipped to offer innovative, efficient and effective solutions. We are continually recognised for our work, and Global Competition Review has named us “one of the world’s leading competition practices”. 

In addition to working with clients dealing with significant domestic and international cartel investigations, we act as trusted advisors to clients on the full spectrum of antitrust issues, including assessments of supply and distribution arrangements and other vertical agreements, horizontal cooperation agreements and monopolization/abuse of dominance questions.  Given the importance of compliance, we help companies devise and implement policies by understanding the risks facing their businesses. Whethere are concerns about conduct, we work with clients to undertake the necessary internal investigations, focussing on identifying and mitigating risk. We also have extensive experience helping clients with queries relating to State aid and public procurement. With years of experience advising clients across regulated sectors, we bring a strategic approach to achieving a successful outcome, and our strength and depth across multiple industries provides clients with exceptional insight into the common themes and challenges facing regulated businesses. 

We help our clients minimise the cost and burden of complying with the multiple systems of merger control that now exist worldwide, and help clients obtain clearance in those jurisdictions where notification is required, in the shortest time and in an efficient and co-ordinated manner. Members of our team have successfully advised on many high profile and complex transactions, including obtaining HSR clearance from the US competition authorities and responding to second requests, as well as Phase II investigations by the European Commission and UK Competition and Markets Authority. Our strong relationships with the US, EU, UK and other competition authorities enable us to navigate the merger control process smoothly, from briefing papers and pre-notification meetings to notifications, oral hearings and, where necessary, negotiated modifications and remedies. We are able rapidly to assess whether and where your transaction may need to be disclosed, and we advise you as to regulatory risk to allow for well-informed decisions that affect the future of your business.  

In the past decade, our award-winning team has been at the forefront of advising clients in disputes concerning alleged anti-competitive conduct, including bringing and defending damages actions and defending class action suits (involving allegations of unlawful agreements, monopolization, and abuse of dominance). Globally, we have acted in many key competition litigation cases. Unlike many practices, we represent a wide range of clients, including both defendants and claimants/plaintiffs. Using our comprehensive knowledge and experience from different standpoints, we stay one step ahead in formulating successful strategies.

Given the current climate of increased antitrust enforcement, a business of any size is likely to receive a third-party subpoena in an agency enforcement investigation, such as those conducted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Department of Justice (DOJ). When a business receives a third-party subpoena for documents, the first concern is always responding to the subpoena. But that is only the beginning. Once compliance is finished, the main concerns are: who will see my documents? How can I prevent other parties—who may be my closest competitors—from seeing my documents? And how can I protect my confidential documents in a cost-effective way? BCLP has extensive experience responding to third-party subpoenas efficiently and cost-effectively. In particular, we can advise you on:

  • What level of confidentiality to choose in a protective order?
  • Will you be successful in adding further layers of confidentiality?
  • How can you limit the access of parties’ employees to your documents?
  • Will you be able to limit outside counsel’s access to your documents?
  • Is complete inaccessibility by parties’ employees to your documents achievable?
  • How to make sure you know who exactly will see your documents?
  • Will you know if the government wants to use your documents outside of the current lawsuit?
  • How can you obtain notice from the parties if your documents are being used publicly?
  • What will happen to your documents at the end of a lawsuit?

If you have any questions about third-party subpoenas or would like to receive training/guidance on this topic, please contact David B. Schwartz, Ashley Kim or your usual BCLP contact.

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis / Washington

+1 314 259 2412
Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley

Australian Registered Foreign Lawyer (admitted in England and Wales) and Global Practice Group Leader - White Collar, Antitrust, and International Trade, Sydney / London

+44 20 3400 4630
Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis / Washington

+1 314 259 2412
Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley

Australian Registered Foreign Lawyer (admitted in England and Wales) and Global Practice Group Leader - White Collar, Antitrust, and International Trade, Sydney / London

+44 20 3400 4630

Meet The Team

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Rebecca A. D. Nelson

Partner and U.S. Leader, Antitrust & Competition, St. Louis / Washington

+1 314 259 2412
Andrew Hockley

Andrew Hockley

Australian Registered Foreign Lawyer (admitted in England and Wales) and Global Practice Group Leader - White Collar, Antitrust, and International Trade, Sydney / London

+44 20 3400 4630

Related Practice Areas

  • Government Contracts & Public Procurement

Related Insights

Insights
Jan 30, 2025

Personalities, Politics and Priorities – What’s New for M&A and EU Competition Law in 2025

It’s all change at the European Commission. Teresa Ribera has taken over the stewardship of DG COMP from Margrethe Vestager, alongside a wider brief including  environmental and social policy that could conflict with competition law orthodoxy. This is set against a backdrop of intensifying political pressure for EU regulation to support the development and productivity of the flat EU economy and possibly the promotion of European champions. In this article, we consider the key EU competition law developments that are likely to impact M&A in 2025 within the world’s largest trading bloc.
News
Jan 28, 2025

BCLP advises Thesis Holdings on its acquisition of Evelyn Partners Fund Solutions

BCLP advised client Thesis Holdings Limited on its acquisition of Evelyn Partners Fund Solutions Limited from Evelyn Partners Group Limited.
Insights
Jan 14, 2025

FTC Announces 2025 HSR Act Thresholds and Filing Fee Schedule

The Federal Trade Commission announced the annual revised thresholds for merger notifications under the Hart Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (“HSR Act”). The thresholds are revised annually based on changes in U.S. gross national product. The FTC also issued its annual revision of the HSR filing fee schedule. The new thresholds (“2025 Thresholds”) will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Therefore, if publication occurs this week, the 2025 Thresholds will become effective in mid-February and be in effect until the next annual adjustment in January 2026.
Insights
Jan 10, 2025

FTC Secures Record-Breaking Gun-Jumping Fine, Opines on Buyer’s Right to Approve Transactions and Lack of Diligence Controls

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) sent a firm message—unlawful coordination of merging businesses prior to the closing under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements (“HSR”) Act will be aggressively enforced. On January 7, 2025, the federal agency secured a record-breaking $5.684 million fine from three oil companies for unlawful coordination—also known as “gun jumping”—in violation of the HSR Act’s mandatory waiting period. The proposed final order, if entered, orders each of the buy side and the sell side to be fined $2.842 million, the largest total gun-jumping penalty in U.S. history.
Insights
Jan 06, 2025

New Year, New UK merger control thresholds – key aspects of the DMCC go live

Key competition law and digital markets aspects of the UK Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (“DMCC”), enforced by the UK Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”), came into force on 1 January 2025. For more information, see our in-depth analyses of the DMCC. We take note below of the UK’s new merger review thresholds, which apply to all deals completing after 1 January 2025 (other than those anticipated deals in respect of which the CMA already had a formal Phase One investigation open in 2024).

Related Insights

News
Feb 12, 2025
BCLP Partner Quoted in Bloomberg on FTC’s Litigation Challenges
Insights
Jan 30, 2025
Personalities, Politics and Priorities – What’s New for M&A and EU Competition Law in 2025
It’s all change at the European Commission. Teresa Ribera has taken over the stewardship of DG COMP from Margrethe Vestager, alongside a wider brief including  environmental and social policy that could conflict with competition law orthodoxy. This is set against a backdrop of intensifying political pressure for EU regulation to support the development and productivity of the flat EU economy and possibly the promotion of European champions. In this article, we consider the key EU competition law developments that are likely to impact M&A in 2025 within the world’s largest trading bloc.
News
Jan 28, 2025
BCLP advises Thesis Holdings on its acquisition of Evelyn Partners Fund Solutions
BCLP advised client Thesis Holdings Limited on its acquisition of Evelyn Partners Fund Solutions Limited from Evelyn Partners Group Limited.
Insights
Jan 27, 2025
Will This Be on the Exam? FTC Staff Issues Two Initial Reports on Surveillance Pricing
Insights
Jan 17, 2025
Disconnecting Companies: DOJ and FTC Push for Broader Interlocking Directorate Liability
News
Jan 15, 2025
BCLP Partner David B. Schwartz Comments in Law360 on Federal Circuit’s Orange Book Ruling
Insights
Jan 14, 2025
FTC Announces 2025 HSR Act Thresholds and Filing Fee Schedule
The Federal Trade Commission announced the annual revised thresholds for merger notifications under the Hart Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (“HSR Act”). The thresholds are revised annually based on changes in U.S. gross national product. The FTC also issued its annual revision of the HSR filing fee schedule. The new thresholds (“2025 Thresholds”) will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Therefore, if publication occurs this week, the 2025 Thresholds will become effective in mid-February and be in effect until the next annual adjustment in January 2026.
Insights
Jan 10, 2025
FTC Secures Record-Breaking Gun-Jumping Fine, Opines on Buyer’s Right to Approve Transactions and Lack of Diligence Controls
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) sent a firm message—unlawful coordination of merging businesses prior to the closing under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements (“HSR”) Act will be aggressively enforced. On January 7, 2025, the federal agency secured a record-breaking $5.684 million fine from three oil companies for unlawful coordination—also known as “gun jumping”—in violation of the HSR Act’s mandatory waiting period. The proposed final order, if entered, orders each of the buy side and the sell side to be fined $2.842 million, the largest total gun-jumping penalty in U.S. history.
Insights
Jan 06, 2025
New Year, New UK merger control thresholds – key aspects of the DMCC go live
Key competition law and digital markets aspects of the UK Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (“DMCC”), enforced by the UK Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”), came into force on 1 January 2025. For more information, see our in-depth analyses of the DMCC. We take note below of the UK’s new merger review thresholds, which apply to all deals completing after 1 January 2025 (other than those anticipated deals in respect of which the CMA already had a formal Phase One investigation open in 2024).