Employment & Labor

Employment & Labor

Employment & Labor

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Overview

Our Employment & Labor Team offers high-calibre advice on a full range of issues, from day-to-day employment matters to high-stakes litigation and transactional support. Our team is well connected across the world. Globally, we have over 50 employment and labor lawyers in 12 offices across the U.S., UK, France, and Germany, as well as a strong presence and extensive experience advising in Asia. We have a strong track record of advising major corporations across various industries and jurisdictions. 

Some areas of particular focus include:

  • Affirmative action and diversity
  • Business protection and employee competition
  • Cross-border employment issues
  • Day-to-day employment advice
  • Employment litigation and arbitration
  • Employee privacy and data protection
  • Health, safety and drug testing
  • Labor law and other collective rights
  • M&A diligence and transactional support
  • Management and employee training
  • Wage & hour and other employment class actions
  • Wage & hour audits
  • Whistleblowers
  • Workplace investigations

We have extensive experience advising on the full spectrum of day-to-day workplace matters such as disciplinary and conduct issues, medical absences and accommodations, performance management, employee grievances, business restructures and the implementation of redundancy programs. We are committed to understanding how our clients’ HR teams operate. We know how important it is for organizations to stay on top of the ever-changing face of employment law and have developed, and regularly provide, a variety of client training programs on topics such as union avoidance and workplace harassment.

We also have extensive experience assisting with employment matters in a regulated context in jurisdictions where a sector focus is valuable. For example, in the UK we have a strong focus in the financial services sector advising on FCA and PRA employment-related issues.

More generally, we work closely with our wider Regulatory team to ensure our advice appropriately reflects the interplay between an organization’s employment law and regulatory duties.

Our Global Workplace Investigations practice is a truly integrated, cross-practice, global team undertaking independent internal investigations, advising employers on the internal investigations they conduct, and representing employers in their dealings with administrative agencies, regulators, criminal authorities, and in litigation. Our team brings their extensive experience litigating various workplace issues to bear on our investigations to uncover and appropriately handle issues that could become flashpoints in litigation.

BCLP's Employment and Labor Team has a proven record of successfully handling and guiding clients through complex investigations related to alleged harassment, discrimination, workplace violence (including workplace shootings), safety issues, immigration enforcement (including ICE raids), whistleblowing allegations, and other compliance and policy violation matters. We also have extensive experience assisting organizations and boards in confidentially investigating and managing serious misconduct allegations against high-ranking executives and leaders. Our experience in this area enables organizations and boards to make informed strategic decisions to address and resolve corporate crises. Additionally, it can greatly reduce the potential for negative impact on an organization’s personnel and culture, as well as mitigate risks associated with legal action and negative publicity.

Our employment investigations and compliance work spans all industries, including education, aerospace, energy and natural resources, financial services/institutions, food and agriculture, healthcare, hospitality,manufacturing, retail, entertainment, media, technology, transportation, as well as professional, Olympic and amateur sports. We approach investigations with the appropriate sensitivity and knowledge of the subject matter from both regulatory and employment perspectives. We collaborate with our wider Investigations team when specific capabilities (e.g., white collar and financial fraud) are needed on a subject, and clients can be confident that we will appropriately react and respond to any risks arising from the fact pattern revealed by the investigation.

We understand that each matter is unique. That's why the BCLP Employment and Labor Team is committed to working closely with clients to design and implement tailored strategies and solutions to the significant issues that they face. This commitment to customization makes our potential clients feel understood and valued, knowing that we are dedicated to addressing their specific needs.

BCLP’s Employment and Labor Team also assists clients in developing policies and procedures for conducting their own internal investigations, provides training to human resources professionals tasked with conducting investigations, and helps organizations develop tracking mechanisms for such investigations.

Our attorneys, with their extensive experience, serve clients from a diverse array of industries across the United States. If you are an employer bound by collective bargaining agreements, we can assist with union negotiations, grievances, and strategic planning. We also offer guidance on meeting multiemployer plan obligations and renegotiating expiring collective bargaining agreements.

Our Labor Relations Team provides advice in:

  • Union avoidance
  • Organizing campaigns
  • Decertification and withdrawal of recognition before the NLRB and state agencies
  • Unfair labor practice proceedings before the NLRB and state agencies
  • Advice and counsel with respect to mergers, acquisitions, and reorganizations
  • Strike planning and injunctions

We provide legal representation for clients involved in various aspects of labor relations law, including handling grievance arbitration proceedings related to disciplinary actions, terminations, and contract interpretation disputes. We also negotiate contracts for multiemployer associations and individual employers, with contracts spanning across different states and at a national level. Additionally, we offer comprehensive legal representation for employers in administrative hearings, state and federal trials, and appellate arguments before both state and federal appeals courts.

Now more than ever it is important for organizations to stay on top of the ever-changing face of labor and employment law. We have developed, and regularly provide, a comprehensive range of client training programs on topics such as union avoidance, discrimination and harassment, hiring and firing, whistleblowers and retaliation, and the ADA and FMLA.

Our team understands that noncompete agreements cannot be evaluated using a one-size-fits-all approach. Our lawyers carefully examine the unique circumstances of each case, and their experience enables them to quickly identify the key issues critical to resolving such cases. We ask our clients tough questions about their business goals and how litigation aligns with those goals to obtain the best possible outcome efficiently.

Our Noncompete, Trade Secret and Employee Unfair Competition Team provides a tremendous depth and geographic breadth of experience in disputes involving covenants not to compete, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of confidentiality agreements, employee raiding, computer misconduct and other employee unfair competition issues. Our trial lawyers are very experienced in providing advice relating to and handling the issues that frequently arise in noncompete, trade secret and similar disputes, including with respect to TROs, preliminary injunctions, expedited discovery, and computer-related discovery. We have extensive research and resource materials on these and related topics, allowing our lawyers to advise clients on the proper drafting and scope of noncompetition covenants, identify and focus quickly on the key issues involved in analyzing noncompete, employee raiding, trade secret and similar disputes, and respond promptly when these disputes arise.

Corporate, inclusion and diversity (I&D) programs are in the legal and political spotlight as they face an increased risk of challenge on a variety of fronts in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision on college admissions affirmative action. A flurry of challenges, including private lawsuits alleging reverse discrimination and hostile work environments, along with state attorney general investigations and attention from conservative groups and activists, complicate companies’ efforts to navigate their employment-related I&D programs and supplier diversity initiatives.

BCLP’s dedicated I&D Task Force helps clients effectively navigate the delicate balance between implementing employment and procurement-related I&D initiatives and avoiding/defending against potential claims associated with those initiatives. The I&D Task Force provides an array of services to assist clients in aligning their I&D programs and communications with their culture and values while mitigating legal risk.

Areas of Focus

  • Conducting an audit and providing a risk assessment of current I&D programs and initiatives, both in employment and in supplier and other contracts
  • Advising on implementing legally defensible I&D initiatives, such as employee resource groups, bonus plans, leadership trainings, and supplier contract programs
  • Reviewing corporate public filings and other corporate communications regarding I&D issues
  • Providing customized I&D training
  • Advising on Affirmative Action Plans and other Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP) obligations
  • Defending I&D-related litigation or governmental action and advising on crisis management
  • Assisting with pay equity and other employment practice audits, including hiring, promotions, and terminations

The I&D Task Force is made up of a multi-disciplinary team of lawyers from BCLP’s Employment & Labor, Securities & Corporate Governance, and Litigation and Dispute Resolution Practice Groups, who together are uniquely positioned to ensure clients are up-to-date and able to respond to the latest developments in this area.

Our Employment & Labor Class Actions Team has defended employers against hundreds high-exposure wage and hour claims. We lead the defense of employment class, collective, and other state-specific representative actions across the country. These cases regularly involve multi-phased discovery, hybrid opt-in and opt-out class and collective action procedures, multiple and differing subclasses, extensive and complex briefing, complicated strategic considerations, and contentious evidentiary hearings. Our team is experienced in handling all aspects of the defense of these unique and complex cases.

We also regularly serve as national counsel on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and state statutes involving overtime/regular rate of pay compliance, meal/rest break compliance, tipped workers, donning and doffing, rounding, travel time, business expense reimbursement, and reclassification of employees/independent contractors. Additionally, we review and revise written wage and hour policies/handbooks and assist with the implementation of new payroll and timekeeping systems and protocols.

Learn more about our Employment Class Actions team >

Mary Margaret (Mimi) Moore

Mary Margaret (Mimi) Moore

Partner and Global Practice Group Leader - Employment & Labor, Chicago / Dallas

+1 312 602 5090
Rebecca Harding-Hill
+44 (0) 20 3400 4104
Mary Margaret (Mimi) Moore

Mary Margaret (Mimi) Moore

Partner and Global Practice Group Leader - Employment & Labor, Chicago / Dallas

+1 312 602 5090
Catherine Turner
+44 (0) 20 3400 4943
Rebecca Harding-Hill
+44 (0) 20 3400 4104

Meet The Team

Mary Margaret (Mimi) Moore

Mary Margaret (Mimi) Moore

Partner and Global Practice Group Leader - Employment & Labor, Chicago / Dallas

+1 312 602 5090
Catherine Turner
+44 (0) 20 3400 4943
Rebecca Harding-Hill
+44 (0) 20 3400 4104

Related Practice Areas

  • ESOP Team

Areas of Focus

  • Cross-border Employment Issues

Experience

Regulatory, compliance and advisory  

  • Ongoing advice for a Fortune 500, worldwide, diversified manufacturer of complex metal components and products servicing aerospace, defense, oil and gas and general industrial markets on compliance with the California Labor Code, leave and anti-discriminations/harassment laws.  
  • Acted for the transferee in the outsourcing of a life and pensions business. The deal is the largest outsourcing arrangement agreed in the European life and pensions sector, with an expected contract value of £1.5bn+ and involving the transfer of approx. 1000 employees.  
  • For the last five years, we have represented a global chain of bakery-cafes, in connection with a variety of labor and employment matters, including employment counselling in the U.S. and internationally, as well as defending the company against Title III claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, wage and hours class actions, and employment disputes. 
  • Over the last 20 years, we have represented and counseled a worldwide hotel chain in nearly every area of law, including labor and employment. The matters range from employment contracting and EEOC charges to employment disputes and defending against Title III claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act.  
  • Developed a training program and self-help wage and hour compliance guide for a fast food restaurant chain. These materials include time-keeping forms, guidance on calculating overtime compensation for restaurant industry employees, including salaried, non-exempt personnel and other practical materials that can be used in the restaurant environment to avoid wage and hour liability exposure. 

Investigations   

  • Conducted hundreds of internal workplace investigations for various employers throughout the country, many of which related to allegations of sexual harassment.
  • Assists clients with “high profile” internal investigations involving harassment and discrimination allegations concerning management and other executive officials.
  • Regularly works with clients to conduct internal investigations of employee claims of harassment and discrimination, and employee violations of codes of conduct.
  • Advised a global FTSE 100 client on a high-profile and sensitive SFO investigation into alleged wrongdoing in overseas jurisdictions.
  • Conducted a whistleblowing investigation for a UK bank into a series of allegations against the Chief Executive.
  • Conducted an investigation of workplace harassment allegations by an employee against the VP of HR at a pharmaceutical company.

Litigation and dispute resolution  

  • Advised a UK-authorized firm on numerous grievances and subsequent employment tribunal proceedings relating to alleged discrimination spanning an eight-year period.  The matter was complicated by the claimant’s serious health issues but a creative settlement was agreed pre-trial.   
  • Won an arbitration defense verdict for a global financial services technology company on claims filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The defense win on plaintiff’s claims came after a robust fight to compel arbitration in the Northern District of Illinois, substantial discovery battles and a two-day arbitration hearing. The arbitrator accepted every procedural and merits defense proffered by client and incorporated the bulk of our post-hearing submission into the arbitration award.  
  • Defended a large privately held manufacturing and retail company in an arbitration of an employment case involving claims of disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (WFEA). The claimant, a disabled man who briefly had a job as a company retail merchandiser in Wisconsin, alleged the company failed to accommodate his disability and that he was terminated because of his disability. We obtained third party records and admissions from the claimant that led to complete victory after a multiday hearing. 
  • Successfully defended a national food products manufacturer in a multi-plaintiff, multi-count federal race discrimination case.  Five plaintiffs alleged race and national origin discrimination and retaliation, including claims based on failure to hire, failure to promote, and disparate treatment in regards to work and shift assignments, performance reviews, compensation, and promotional opportunities. We obtained summary judgment on nearly all claims. On appeal, two plaintiffs obtained partial reversal of the summary judgment ruling, and a seven-day trial resulted in a complete defense verdict in favor of our client and we were awarded our costs. 
  • Successfully represented a pharmaceutical company in Russian labour disputes over accrual and payment of regional coefficients and percentage allowance over and above employee salaries in 3 regions (northern hardship bonus payment). 
  • Successfully defeated class certification in a putative class action against a retail client, alleging misclassification of assistant store managers as exempt from overtime law, meal/rest break violations, and wage statement violations. 
  • Successfully defeated class certification in a putative class action alleging expense reimbursement violations under California law against a financial institution. 
  • Obtained a summary judgment against the EEOC in an age discrimination case brought on behalf of 450 former employees. 
  • Settled a nationwide class action claiming retiree health care benefits for 50,000 former employees for an international aircraft manufacturer. 
  • Won at trial, and affirmed on appeal, in a WARN Act case as to whether sudden mass layoffs were “reasonably foreseeable.” 
  • Successfully represented a bakery restaurant group as the defendant in a wage and hour class action brought on behalf of tipped employees alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York labor laws.

Labor relations 

  • Handled more than 70 different collective bargaining agreements with Teamsters, UFCW and UAW, and negotiated and secured unique neutrality agreement with company’s largest labor union.
  • Handled two dozen labor arbitrations in six months for a large grocery chain seeking to reduce a backlog.
  • Orchestrated withdrawal of recognition from unions at a uranium mine and a national trucking company.
  • Defended more than two dozen contract interpretation and discharge grievances throughout the United States in various industries.
  • Counsel for Chicago trucking company in 10(j) injunction hearing relating to unfair labor practices. At the conclusion of a bench trial, obtained a favorable settlement comprised of a new union election in which company prevailed.
  • As former general counsel at the NLRB, Jerry Hunter supervised the Office of General Counsel and the agency's 1,800 employees. Jerry oversaw the operations of 33 regional, two sub-regional and 17 resident offices, prosecuted unfair labor practice cases before the five-member board, and represented the agency before the federal district courts, the U.S. courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court.
  • Prosecuted a defendant class action for a Fortune 100 client as trustee of pension funds subject to competing claims of its unionized workers.

Wage and hour class actions

  • Represented casino and its subsidiaries in three complex class and collective actions pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Southern District of Indiana, and the District of New Jersey. We deposed dozens of current and former hourly employee and briefed very complicated class and collective issues involving various state wage and hour statutes and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. These were the highest value lawsuits for the casino in 2021 and 2022, with potential damages in total of upwards of $30 million. For one of the cases we recently settled, we achieved a settlement that is less than ten percent of the pay-outs in publicly available settlements with these same opposing counsel filed against peer casinos. Our results have saved the client tens of millions of dollars in not only attorneys’ fees, but settlement dollars as well.
  • Obtained a complete defense victory in a case filed against a market leader in electronic medical records software alleging that employees were misclassified as exempt from overtime. The defense team argued that multiple exemptions likely applied and defended the company’s classification on all available bases (administrative and computer exemptions) and also asserted the seldom used (yet powerful) argument for the “combination exemption” which argues that a fact-finder can combine multiple bases for exemption in reaching a decision on exempt status. Following a three-day arbitration and hundreds of pages of post-hearing briefing, the arbitrator issued an award in favor of the client on all issues concluding that evidence was persuasive and overwhelming, that claimant’s self-serving testimony was not credible, and that all bases asserted for exemption were established by the client.
  • Successfully represented a car rental company in a multidistrict litigation challenging the exempt classification of nearly 15,000 assistant branch managers at the company’s locations across the U.S. From start to finish, the case was litigated more than seven years in 16 jurisdictions. After some key victories on class-specific legal issues and an unwavering resolve to defend the case, we were able to leverage a remarkable settlement in favor of our client
  • Represented an employer in an investigation by the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). In 2019, while another law firm was representing the car wash, the DLSE issued a citation against the car wash for $2.3 million, which is the largest citation in the DLSE’s history. The company hired BCLP to represent them in the appeal of the $2.3 million citation. After a contentious hearing spanning several months, BCLP obtained a settlement that was a fraction of the citation amount.
  • Successfully defeated class certification in a putative class action in California state court against a Fortune 500 aerospace manufacturer, alleging wage and hour violations relating to meal and rest periods, rounding, and tool expense.

Related Insights

Insights
Nov 20, 2024

The Wait Is Over: DOL Increase to Salary Threshold Thrown Out, Nationwide

After months of speculation, the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order invalidating the U.S. Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) rule increasing the minimum salary threshold that must be paid to certain employees to render them exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Specifically, the court found that the DOL exceeded its rulemaking authority by putting a “sharp increase” on salary minimums that “effectively displace[d]” the job duties tests for those exemptions. Many employers were awaiting this ruling as they considered whether to sharply increase certain exempt employees’ salaries on January 1 to meet the new threshold or reclassify them as “non-exempt” and start paying overtime. For now, employers can go “pencils down” on that review.
Insights
Nov 15, 2024

Successful Missouri Ballot Initiative Ups State Minimum Wage and Imposes New Paid Leave Requirements

As 2024 election results roll in, Missouri employers should take note of two new employment requirements enacted via ballot initiative. Missouri voters passed the ballot initiative known as Proposition A, which will increase the state’s minimum wage and require private employers to provide employees with paid sick and safe leave (“PSSL”). Missouri joins Nebraska and Alaska, which passed similar ballot initiatives this fall, on the list of over twenty states where employees will be entitled to some form of earned PSSL. The leave requirements will be codified as RSMo 290.600-642, and the state minimum wage will appear in RSMo 290.502.
Insights
Oct 31, 2024

The sexual harassment preventative duty is now in force - why it is needed

This week we mark the introduction on 26 October of the duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment, and consider a few recent cases showing that this is a workplace issue that refuses to go away
Insights
Oct 30, 2024

Autumn Budget 2024 – Key Employment Highlights

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, has published her Autumn 2024 budget with the aim of “fixing the foundations of the economy and delivering change by protecting working people.” We set out a very brief summary of the employment law aspects of the budget.
Insights
Oct 24, 2024

Employment Rights Bill, whistleblowing, and sex-based discrimination

This week we summarise three very recent developments in employment law, one involving the Employment Rights Bill (ERB) and two new cases.
Insights
Oct 22, 2024

NLRB General Counsel Targets Non-Competes and Stay-or-Pay Provisions

Last week, the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel Jennifer A. Abruzzo (the “GC”) announced her position that “stay-or-pay” provisions in employment agreements are unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”). The GC also reiterated and built on an earlier memo in which she took the position that almost all non-competes are similarly unlawful under the NLRA because they infringe on “Section 7” rights (which include the right to union and engage in other “protected concerted activity”). Employers—even if “non-union”—should consider the following questions.
Insights
Oct 17, 2024

The Employment Rights Bill 2024 - Points of Interest

This week we cover certain selected areas of the Employment Rights Bill, published on 10 October 2024.  It is Labour’s flagship employment legislation.
Insights
Oct 10, 2024

Sexual Harassment – The Preventative Duty

After a slightly extended summer break, we return with a summary of the new sexual harassment rules due to come into force in just over two weeks.

Related Insights

Insights
Nov 20, 2024
The Wait Is Over: DOL Increase to Salary Threshold Thrown Out, Nationwide
After months of speculation, the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order invalidating the U.S. Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) rule increasing the minimum salary threshold that must be paid to certain employees to render them exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Specifically, the court found that the DOL exceeded its rulemaking authority by putting a “sharp increase” on salary minimums that “effectively displace[d]” the job duties tests for those exemptions. Many employers were awaiting this ruling as they considered whether to sharply increase certain exempt employees’ salaries on January 1 to meet the new threshold or reclassify them as “non-exempt” and start paying overtime. For now, employers can go “pencils down” on that review.
Insights
Nov 15, 2024
Successful Missouri Ballot Initiative Ups State Minimum Wage and Imposes New Paid Leave Requirements
As 2024 election results roll in, Missouri employers should take note of two new employment requirements enacted via ballot initiative. Missouri voters passed the ballot initiative known as Proposition A, which will increase the state’s minimum wage and require private employers to provide employees with paid sick and safe leave (“PSSL”). Missouri joins Nebraska and Alaska, which passed similar ballot initiatives this fall, on the list of over twenty states where employees will be entitled to some form of earned PSSL. The leave requirements will be codified as RSMo 290.600-642, and the state minimum wage will appear in RSMo 290.502.
Insights
Oct 31, 2024
The sexual harassment preventative duty is now in force - why it is needed
This week we mark the introduction on 26 October of the duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment, and consider a few recent cases showing that this is a workplace issue that refuses to go away
Insights
Oct 30, 2024
Autumn Budget 2024 – Key Employment Highlights
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, has published her Autumn 2024 budget with the aim of “fixing the foundations of the economy and delivering change by protecting working people.” We set out a very brief summary of the employment law aspects of the budget.
Insights
Oct 24, 2024
Employment Rights Bill, whistleblowing, and sex-based discrimination
This week we summarise three very recent developments in employment law, one involving the Employment Rights Bill (ERB) and two new cases.
Insights
Oct 23, 2024
SDNY Chief Judge Holds that Stand-alone Website Is Not a Place of Public Accommodation
Insights
Oct 22, 2024
NLRB General Counsel Targets Non-Competes and Stay-or-Pay Provisions
Last week, the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel Jennifer A. Abruzzo (the “GC”) announced her position that “stay-or-pay” provisions in employment agreements are unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”). The GC also reiterated and built on an earlier memo in which she took the position that almost all non-competes are similarly unlawful under the NLRA because they infringe on “Section 7” rights (which include the right to union and engage in other “protected concerted activity”). Employers—even if “non-union”—should consider the following questions.
Insights
Oct 17, 2024
The Employment Rights Bill 2024 - Points of Interest
This week we cover certain selected areas of the Employment Rights Bill, published on 10 October 2024.  It is Labour’s flagship employment legislation.
Insights
Oct 10, 2024
Sexual Harassment – The Preventative Duty
After a slightly extended summer break, we return with a summary of the new sexual harassment rules due to come into force in just over two weeks.