Isabel Guariglia

Isabel Guariglia
  1. People /

Isabel Guariglia

Isabel Guariglia

BCLP Fellow


St. Louis
Isabel Guariglia
  1. People /

Isabel Guariglia

Isabel Guariglia

BCLP Fellow


St. Louis

Isabel Guariglia

BCLP Fellow

St. Louis

T: +1 314 259 2023

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Biography

Isabel is a BCLP fellow in the St Louis office, splitting her time between the firm’s Business and Commercial Disputes Practice Group and pro bono work for the Midwest Innocence Project. At BCLP, she assists on a range of general litigation matters. Isabel's pro bono work at the Midwest Innocence Project focuses on litigation and prevention of wrongful convictions.

During Law school, Isabel clerked for the Hon. Judge Amy Weinhaus at the EEOC and provided immigration legal services with the Migrant Immigrant Community Action Project. She also served as managing editor of the Global Studies Law Review.

Prior to attending law school, Isabel received her B.A. in journalism at the University of Missouri, Columbia, where she graduated in the top 10% of her class.

Admissions

  • Missouri, 2023

Education

  • Washington University in St. Louis, J.D., 2023
  • University of Missouri, B.A., magna cum laude, 2020

Related Practice Areas

  • Business & Commercial Disputes

  • Intellectual Property and Technology Disputes

  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

  • Regulation, Compliance & Advisory

  • Class Actions & Mass Torts

Related Insights

News
Nov 21, 2024

Key Takeaways from Snyder v. United States

Snyder v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1947 (2024), which held that a federal bribery statute (18 U.S.C. § 666) does not criminalize “gratuities”—payments made corruptly to public officials after-the-fact as rewards for their actions—was lauded as a great win for the white-collar bar. But what about the Supreme Court’s approach to statutory interpretation in Snyder? Not so great, at least in our view. Snyder’s majority opinion provides a playbook for the Supreme Court, in this and future iterations, to engage in a policy-first, text-last approach to statutory interpretation that should make our profession wary, white-collar bar included.

Related Insights

News
Nov 21, 2024
Key Takeaways from Snyder v. United States
Snyder v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1947 (2024), which held that a federal bribery statute (18 U.S.C. § 666) does not criminalize “gratuities”—payments made corruptly to public officials after-the-fact as rewards for their actions—was lauded as a great win for the white-collar bar. But what about the Supreme Court’s approach to statutory interpretation in Snyder? Not so great, at least in our view. Snyder’s majority opinion provides a playbook for the Supreme Court, in this and future iterations, to engage in a policy-first, text-last approach to statutory interpretation that should make our profession wary, white-collar bar included.