Caitlin M. Hartsell


Caitlin M. Hartsell
  1. People /

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Partner


Caitlin M. Hartsell
  1. People /

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Partner

Caitlin M. Hartsell

Partner

San Francisco

T: +1 415 675 3424

VcardVcard
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Biography

Caitlin Hartsell focuses her practice on the corporate transactional issues of both public and private companies. She regularly represents clients in a broad range of transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, securities offerings, financings and restructurings. Caitlin also advises clients on corporate governance issues, general securities law issues, and the drafting and negotiation of various commercial contracts, including services agreements, licensing agreements, supply agreements, non-disclosure agreements and manufacturing agreements.

Her practice spans a number of industries including health care, financial services, renewable energy, agricultural technology, financial technology, higher education, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and insurance. In addition to her Juris Doctorate, Caitlin also has a Master of Public Health degree from Washington University in St. Louis.

  • San Francisco Recruiting Committee (Chair)
  • Corporate Training Committee (Co-Chair)

The Corporate Transparency Act

The Corporate Transparency Act

CTA resource page

Use our resource page to keep up to date on FAQs, events, and analysis & insights on the Corporate Transparency Act.

CTA compliance tool

Many businesses are wondering if they need to comply with the CTA, and if so, whose data they may need to gather and when it should be first submitted and updated. Use our interactive CTA compliance tool to learn more about the nuts and bolts of the CTA.

Admissions

  • California, 2016
  • Illinois, 2014
  • Missouri, 2013

Education

Washington University, J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, 2013

Washington University, M.P.H., 2013

Washington University, A.B., with honors, 2009

Related Insights

Insights
Jul 09, 2024

Gone but not forgotten: New FinCEN guidance on CTA reporting requirements for companies that cease to exist

FinCEN clarifies that entities that are dissolved in 2024, or merge into other entities in 2024, do still have beneficial ownership information filing requirements if not exempt.
Insights
Jun 18, 2024

The CTA’s Impact on Trusts

Insights
Jan 29, 2024

Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption

*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.

Related Insights

Insights
Dec 17, 2024
Reporting companies may face a last-minute scramble to comply with the Corporate Transparency Act due to accelerated appellate timeline related to the preliminary injunction
Insights
Dec 04, 2024
Texas court issues nationwide injunction less than a month before the Corporate Transparency Act's reporting deadline
Insights
Nov 11, 2024
Corporate Transparency Act: Ongoing litigation not likely to change end-of-year filing dates
Insights
Aug 02, 2024
Corporate Transparency Wave: New York and Beyond
Insights
Jul 22, 2024
CTA and Corporate Governance: A Quick Guide for Situations Where CTA Comes into Play
Insights
Jul 09, 2024
Gone but not forgotten: New FinCEN guidance on CTA reporting requirements for companies that cease to exist
FinCEN clarifies that entities that are dissolved in 2024, or merge into other entities in 2024, do still have beneficial ownership information filing requirements if not exempt.
Insights
Jun 18, 2024
The CTA’s Impact on Trusts
Insights
Apr 25, 2024
FinCEN updates CTA FAQs for the first time in three months
Insights
Jan 29, 2024
Navigating the Corporate Transparency Act maze: hidden pitfalls of employee structuring for the large operating company exemption
*A significant point of consideration for larger, privately held companies lies in the structuring of their employee base. Many companies opt for a structure where all employees are retained in a separate subsidiary or subsidiaries for various operational reasons, including tax benefits and employment-related efficiencies. However, under the CTA, this common practice could inadvertently expose companies to reporting requirements.With the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) now in effect, it is crucial for privately held mid-sized and large companies to look into and re-examine their corporate structures to ensure compliance with the new law. While the CTA primarily targets smaller companies in lightly regulated industries, larger companies should not automatically assume they and all of their affiliates are exempt from its reporting requirements. This is particularly true for those using common employee structures where employees are retained in separate subsidiaries or affiliates of a holding or operating company of the business. Such structures could inadvertently place the holding and operating companies, as well as their subsidiaries, under the ambit of CTA’s reporting requirements, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review of such businesses’ corporate and employment structures to ensure full compliance with the CTA. We will discuss the employee prong of the “large operating company” exemption in more detail below, with examples of how an organization’s structure might affect the analysis.