Washington

Washington

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

1155 F Street NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20004-1357
United States

BCLP’s Washington, D.C., office offers the firm’s local, national and global clients a strong connection to the regulatory, legislative and judicial center of the United States.

Among many of our practices with members in the Washington office, we have a significant Commercial Disputes Practice, a Corporate Practice advising on transactional matters, and Federal Regulatory, Public Policy and Business Practices to support our clients located in the United States and around the world.

A core value of our global firm is to operate from a “One Firm” approach, and our lawyers in Washington work as part of an integrated team of lawyers worldwide to serve clients’ needs in key business and financial markets. The Washington team helps clients and colleagues throughout the world respond to U.S. government decisions, navigate evolving regulatory environments, and advocate for their business needs before judicial and legislative authorities.  

Community

Our firm recognizes the value in making a difference in our communities and society. Our Washington lawyers are deeply involved in pro bono efforts, both locally and firmwide, and in community service. The Washington office actively supports the Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia, the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, Whitman-Walker Health Foundation and the Children’s Hospital Race for Every Child.

Community

Our firm recognizes the value in making a difference in our communities and society. Our Washington lawyers are deeply involved in pro bono efforts, both locally and firmwide, and in community service. The Washington office actively supports the Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia, the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, Whitman-Walker Health Foundation and the Children’s Hospital Race for Every Child.

Meet The Team

Philip D. Bartz

Philip D. Bartz

Office Managing Partner, Washington

+1 202 508 6022

Related Insights

Insights
Feb 06, 2025

Litigation trends for 2025: what will this year hold for business and commercial disputes?

We explore the trends for Business and Commercial Disputes in the UK, US and France/EU in 2025. Here's what you should know. UK In the spotlight: corporates asserting privilege against shareholders Continued focus on litigation funding Increase in open justice Easier enforcement Court-compelled Negotiated Dispute Resolution – watch this space France Rise of mass claims in France and rise of class actions in France and the EU The new EU product liability directive adopted on October 11, 2024 Rise of ESG related claims US More M&A deals means more post-closing disputes? Head off rising number of workplace issues with internal investigations Disclosure of litigation funding in the United States
Blog Post
Feb 03, 2025

Executive Order Seeks to Impose False Claims Act Liability on Government Contractor and Grantee DEI Programs

On January 21, 2025, the Trump Administration issued an executive order entitled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit Based Opportunity” (“EO”). The stated purpose of the EO is to direct the federal government to enforce the civil rights laws by taking action against “illegal” preferences and discrimination, including measures taking aim at private sector diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) policies and programs. As we highlighted, the EO has significant implications for federal contractor affirmative action obligations and serves as a strong signal of the Trump administration’s increased scrutiny toward private sector DEI programs. Importantly, the EO also seeks to impose False Claims Act liability on federal contractors and grant recipients who maintain DEI programs that run afoul of federal civil rights law.
Insights
Oct 23, 2024

The FTC and State Case Against Amazon Highlights Risks and Impacts from Using Pricing Algorithms

Both the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division have focused their sights on big technology companies. Understanding the precedents set by these suits is critical for clients operating in today’s online marketplaces, both to avoid the risk of antitrust investigations or litigation, and to understand whether a client has been harmed by potentially unlawful conduct.  A September 30, 2024 decision by Judge Chun in the Western District of Washington in the FTC v. Amazon.com case—unsealed to the public on October 7, 2024—demonstrates the increasing breadth of the agencies’ antitrust theories and the wide impacts of Amazon’s sprawling pricing algorithms.*
Insights
Oct 21, 2024

FTC Announces New Premerger Notification Form

On October 10, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), with the concurrence of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, (the “DOJ”, and together, the “Agencies”) voted unanimously to adopt new premerger notification rules (the “Final Rule”) that implement the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”). The Agencies had previously announced proposed amendments on June 27, 2023, which we covered in a previous insight. The Final Rule reflects numerous changes made during a lengthy review and comment period, including a thorough revamping of the Premerger Notification and Report Form (the “New Form”) that parties are each required to complete if their transaction is reportable under the HSR Act.

Related Insights

Insights
Feb 06, 2025
Litigation trends for 2025: what will this year hold for business and commercial disputes?
We explore the trends for Business and Commercial Disputes in the UK, US and France/EU in 2025. Here's what you should know. UK In the spotlight: corporates asserting privilege against shareholders Continued focus on litigation funding Increase in open justice Easier enforcement Court-compelled Negotiated Dispute Resolution – watch this space France Rise of mass claims in France and rise of class actions in France and the EU The new EU product liability directive adopted on October 11, 2024 Rise of ESG related claims US More M&A deals means more post-closing disputes? Head off rising number of workplace issues with internal investigations Disclosure of litigation funding in the United States
Blog Post
Feb 03, 2025
Executive Order Seeks to Impose False Claims Act Liability on Government Contractor and Grantee DEI Programs
On January 21, 2025, the Trump Administration issued an executive order entitled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit Based Opportunity” (“EO”). The stated purpose of the EO is to direct the federal government to enforce the civil rights laws by taking action against “illegal” preferences and discrimination, including measures taking aim at private sector diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) policies and programs. As we highlighted, the EO has significant implications for federal contractor affirmative action obligations and serves as a strong signal of the Trump administration’s increased scrutiny toward private sector DEI programs. Importantly, the EO also seeks to impose False Claims Act liability on federal contractors and grant recipients who maintain DEI programs that run afoul of federal civil rights law.
News
Jan 15, 2025
BCLP Partner David B. Schwartz Comments in Law360 on Federal Circuit’s Orange Book Ruling
Insights
Jan 15, 2025
State of Tennessee v. Cardona: Implications of the Vacatur of the 2024 Title IX Regulations
Insights
Dec 20, 2024
Never Bad-Mouth Synergy: FTC and DOJ Withdraw Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations Among Competitors
Webinars
Nov 27, 2024
What the FTC’s final rule on consumer reviews and testimonials means for your business
News
Oct 30, 2024
Former Seattle Mayor and U.S. Attorney Jenny Durkan Joins BCLP
Insights
Oct 23, 2024
The FTC and State Case Against Amazon Highlights Risks and Impacts from Using Pricing Algorithms
Both the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division have focused their sights on big technology companies. Understanding the precedents set by these suits is critical for clients operating in today’s online marketplaces, both to avoid the risk of antitrust investigations or litigation, and to understand whether a client has been harmed by potentially unlawful conduct.  A September 30, 2024 decision by Judge Chun in the Western District of Washington in the FTC v. Amazon.com case—unsealed to the public on October 7, 2024—demonstrates the increasing breadth of the agencies’ antitrust theories and the wide impacts of Amazon’s sprawling pricing algorithms.*
Insights
Oct 21, 2024
FTC Announces New Premerger Notification Form
On October 10, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), with the concurrence of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, (the “DOJ”, and together, the “Agencies”) voted unanimously to adopt new premerger notification rules (the “Final Rule”) that implement the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”). The Agencies had previously announced proposed amendments on June 27, 2023, which we covered in a previous insight. The Final Rule reflects numerous changes made during a lengthy review and comment period, including a thorough revamping of the Premerger Notification and Report Form (the “New Form”) that parties are each required to complete if their transaction is reportable under the HSR Act.