Litigation & Dispute team
Global Department Leader – Litigation & Investigations, San Francisco
EMEA Leader – Litigation & Investigations, London
Global Department Leader – Litigation & Investigations, San Francisco
EMEA Leader – Litigation & Investigations, London
News & Insights
News
Jan 15, 2025
Jan 15, 2025
BCLP Partner David B. Schwartz Comments in Law360 on Federal Circuit’s Orange Book Ruling
News
Jan 15, 2025
Jan 15, 2025
BCLP Partners Jenny Durkan and Sarah Hartley Present at AALS 2025 Annual Meeting
Insights
Jan 15, 2025
Jan 15, 2025
State of Tennessee v. Cardona: Implications of the Vacatur of the 2024 Title IX Regulations
Insights
Dec 19, 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Briefcase 2024 Quarter 4: Key Real Estate Cases and Updates
Insights
Dec 19, 2024
Dec 19, 2024
Litigation & Investigations in Action: 2024
As 2024 draws to a close, we look back at some of the highlights across BCLP's Litigation & Investigations team. Our lawyers have successfully represented our clients across a myriad of high-stakes disputes globally, as well as being at the forefront of notable Pro Bono efforts and thought leadership initiatives.
Insights
Dec 13, 2024
Dec 13, 2024
BCLP International Arbitration Survey 2024
Insights
Dec 02, 2024
Dec 02, 2024
Managing Litigation Risks of Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) use in business has proliferated in recent years; risks arising from this therefore must be managed. Whilst the use of AI can drive significant efficiency gains for most businesses, the characteristics of machine learning mean that there is the potential for data protection and discrimination claims to arise (amongst others). We explore some of the potential litigation risks in the UK arising and how these risks can be managed.
Insights
Nov 27, 2024
Nov 27, 2024
Cold Comfort: Court of Appeal takes a Chill Approach to Freezing Injunctions
The Court of Appeal has clarified the requirements to be satisfied before obtaining a freezing injunction, affirming an attainable merits threshold is to be preferred over a more stringent alternative. Any perceived tilt in favour of prospective applicants, however, is tempered by a heightened emphasis on the requirement for any potential order to be “just and convenient”. In this insight, Rachel Ziegler and Sanjay Lohano examine the Court of Appeal decision in Dos Santos v Unitel S.A., providing practical insights for prospective applicants looking to utilise one of the law’s so-called “nuclear weapons”.
News
Nov 26, 2024
Nov 26, 2024
BCLP Roundup Team helps secure 15th favorable outcome for Monsanto