BCLPSecCorpGov.com

New SEC guidance eases Form S-3 registration process for more public companies

New SEC guidance eases Form S-3 registration process for more public companies

Mar 21, 2025
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

What Happened

On March 20, 2025, the SEC staff published new interpretations:

  • Allowing any company to file and go effective with a Form S-3 shelf registration statement after filing its Form 10-K but before filing its proxy statement.
  • Relaxing certain disclosure requirements for foreign private issuers.

Takeaways

The new registration statement guidance will make capital raises by non-WKSI companies filing on Form S-3 easier, as they can proceed with offerings during periods before their proxy statements are finalized – a privilege previously only available to WKSIs (large seasoned public companies). 

However, companies will need to consider whether to supplement their disclosures with any pending Part III information that may be material in the context of the particular offering.  For example, while a company may look to rely on information from the prior year’s proxy statement and subsequent Item 5.02 Form 8-Ks in a shelf takedown prospectus, in some cases an additional Form 8-K may make sense.

Deeper Dive

Filing or effectiveness of Form S-3 after Form 10-K but before proxy statement

In Revised CDI 114.05 (and Revised CDI 198.05), the staff extended the flexibility previously afforded only to WKSIs eligible to file automatically effective registration statements on Form S-3ASR to any company eligible to file Form S-3.  This means that any eligible company can file and go effective with a Form S-3 during the gap period -- after filing its 10-K but before Part III information that will be incorporated into the 10-K from the proxy statement.

The staff withdrew CDI 123.01, which previously required companies filing non-automatic registration statements during the gap period to include Part III information in the 10-K or file the definitive proxy statement before the S-3 was declared effective.

At the same time, staff continues to caution that companies should make sure to include any information required to prevent the prospectus from becoming misleading.  It stated:

“[I]issuers are responsible for ensuring that any prospectus used in connection with a registered offering contains the information required to be included therein by Securities Act Section 10(a) and Schedule A.” 

This statement suggests that companies should take care that disclosures in the prospectus are sufficient at the time of the offering.

Relief for foreign private issuers

The SEC staff also published several interpretations relating to FPIs:

Related Practice Areas

  • Securities & Corporate Governance

Meet The Team

Meet The Team

Meet The Team

This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.