We Are Industry Leaders
Practice or Sector
Location
Type
People
Practice or Sector
Location
Type
People
29 Results
Horace Pang
Insights
Jun 28, 2024
Jun 28, 2024
In G v N [2024] HKCFI 721 (judgment date: 11 March 2024), a Hong Kong court dismissed an application to set aside the enforcement of an interim order which an arbitrator had made requiring a party to…
Insights
Jun 25, 2024
Jun 25, 2024
Changes in the payment and adjudication processes regarding variations and time-related disputes
In May 2024, the Hong Kong Government introduced the Construction Industry Security of Payment Bill (Bill) to the Legislative Council for first reading. If the Bill is passed into law, the Bill will…
Insights
Jun 25, 2024
Jun 25, 2024
In G v N [2023] HKCFI 3366 (judgment date: 29 December 2023), a Hong Kong court considered the question of whether and to what extent it is open for the court to review an arbitrator’s ruling on…
Insights
Jun 24, 2024
Jun 24, 2024
Key developments and changes in comparison with the existing contractual security of payment regime
In May 2024, the Hong Kong Government introduced the Construction Industry Security of Payment Bill (Bill) to the Legislative Council for first reading. If the Bill is passed into law, the Bill will…
Insights
May 29, 2024
May 29, 2024
Hong Kong Security of Payment Bill gazetted
The long-anticipated Construction Industry Security of Payment Bill (“Bill”) was gazetted on 17 May 2024 and was introduced into LegCo for its first reading on 29 May 2024. The Bill aims to establish…
Insights
Sep 21, 2022
Sep 21, 2022
Hong Kong Court of Appeal decision on cartel fines imposed on entities within the same undertaking
Competition Commission v W. Hing Construction & others [2022] HKCA 786 (judgment date: 2 June 2022) concerned an appeal from the first Hong Kong judgments concerning pecuniary penalties for…
Insights
Aug 02, 2022
Aug 02, 2022
Hong Kong court continued the validity of a Mareva injunction granted in connection with the enforcement proceedings of a CIETAC award, and dismissed an application for security or fortification in…
Insights
Jul 29, 2022
Jul 29, 2022
In AW and others v PY and another [2022] HKCFI 1397 (judgment date: 13 May 2022), a Hong Kong court held that it has no power to extend the time to challenge an arbitral award under Article 34 of the…
Insights
Apr 04, 2022
Apr 04, 2022
In Arjowiggins HKK2 Ltd v X Co [2022] HKCFI 128, after dismissing the claims and declining to grant the pleaded remedy, the tribunal invited submissions from the parties on an alternative remedy and…
Insights
Mar 29, 2022
Mar 29, 2022
Pleading claims by sampling and extrapolation: recent guidance given by the UK Court of Appeal
Sampling and extrapolation is a common approach for presenting evidence in complex construction and commercial disputes. The exercise involves identifying and examining a properly representative set…
Insights
Feb 15, 2022
Feb 15, 2022
In 廣東順德展煒商貿有限公司 v Sun Fung Timber Company Limited [2021] HKCFI 2407, a Hong Kong court set aside an enforcement order in respect of an arbitral award, after finding that the shareholder-director of…
Insights
Feb 14, 2022
Feb 14, 2022
It is well-established in Hong Kong that the test for determining the validity of an opposition to a winding-up petition is whether the petition debt is disputed in good faith on substantial grounds.…
Insights
Feb 09, 2022
Feb 09, 2022
In the anonymised case of T v B [2021] HKCFI 3645, the High Court of Hong Kong ruled that a challenge concerning the non-compliance with a condition precedent for commencing arbitration (“pre…
Insights
Jan 06, 2022
Jan 06, 2022
On 12 October 2021, the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) handed down its judgment on the merits of the first private action in Hong Kong for a contravention of a competition rule…
This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.