Insights

Hong Kong Security of Payment Ordinance passed; goes into operation on 28 August 2025

Hong Kong Security of Payment Ordinance passed; goes into operation on 28 August 2025

Dec 20, 2024
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Summary

The second and third reading of the Construction Industry Security of Payment Bill concluded at the Legislative Council on 18 December 2024.

As an important milestone of the security of payment regime in Hong Kong, the Construction Industry Security of Payment Ordinance (“Ordinance”) will be published in the Government Gazette on 27 December 2024. According to section 1(3), the provisions on power of Secretary for Development for registration and administration of Adjudicator Nominating Bodies (“ANBs”) will take effect on the gazettal date, i.e. 27 December 2024.

The remaining provisions of the Ordinance will come into operation on 28 August 2025. Construction contracts entered into on or after this date will be governed by the Ordinance.

Key amendments since the introduction of the Bill

Having considered the views of the Bills Committee and other stakeholders, the Government proposed certain amendments to the Bill and these were considered by the Legislative Council. These amendments are likely to be included in the Ordinance, and we set out below a summary of the key amendments. Upon gazettal, we will provide a further update with full details of the published Ordinance.

Changes to the rules regarding setting aside and enforcement of determinations

The original intent was for the Court of First Instance to grant leave to enforce a determination within seven days after the date of an enforcement application except under certain circumstances.

However, the administration proposed that both the Court of First Instance and the District Court are to be conferred jurisdiction to process set aside applications and enforcement applications within their respective jurisdictions. Further, rather than the strict seven-day deadline, a court is to decide on an enforcement application within 14 days or a period that the court considers appropriate.

Adjudicator’s power to exclude new representatives

The administration also proposed an amendment that if a party to an adjudication proposes a change of its representation in the adjudication, the adjudicator is now given the power to exclude the proposed new representative from the adjudication proceedings if the adjudicator considers that the change may give rise to conflict of interest or justifiable doubt as to the adjudicator’s independence or impartiality.

Disclosure of adjudication information

The original intention of the Bill, was that a person may disclose adjudication information to another person if the disclosure is made in another adjudication or other dispute resolution proceedings (“other proceedings”) in connection with the same construction contract in respect of which the payment dispute under the adjudication arises.

The administration proposed an amendment that in addition to the “same construction contract” requirement, the person may only disclose if the other proceedings are between the same parties to the adjudication.

What will happen between now and 28 August 2025?

In the next eight months before all provisions of the Ordinance come into operation on 28 August 2025, the industry will need to prepare for the implementation of the security of payment regime, e.g. reviewing and revising templates and preparing for use of adjudication, registering ANBs and training of adjudicator

For articles previously published by BCLP on the topic of Security of Payment, please refer to:

Related Practice Areas

  • Infrastructure

  • Real Estate

  • Commercial Construction & Engineering

This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.