Insights

BCLP International Arbitration Survey 2024

BCLP International Arbitration Survey 2024

Arbitration and the Challenges of Corruption

Dec 13, 2024
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

 

Does arbitration have the tools to tackle the elephant in the room?

Read the full survey report>

This year, our Annual Arbitration Survey focuses on the issue of corruption and the challenges it poses for international arbitration.

Corruption is a complex social, political and economic phenomenon that affects all countries.  The United Nations and World Economic Forum have estimated the global cost of corruption at 5% of the world’s Gross Domestic Product.  In spite of international efforts to combat corruption, it remains one of the biggest challenges facing international commerce.  As a result, the treatment of corruption allegations in commercial and investment arbitration is of particular significance. 

Recent cases, including the widely reported decision in The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments, have highlighted the challenges faced by arbitrators when dealing with corruption allegations and the impact that this can have on the reputation of arbitration as a method of dispute resolution.  

This year’s survey canvases views on some of those risks and asks whether change is needed to avoid arbitration becoming a safe harbour for corruption.

Key findings include:

  • 64% of respondents indicated a high or moderately high level of concern about the risk of abuse of the arbitral process in cases involving allegations of corruption.
  • 82% of respondents indicated high or moderately high level of confidence in the robustness of the arbitration process.
  • 58% of respondents were concerned that the confidential nature of arbitration increases the risk of abuse of the arbitration process.
  • 67% of respondents were in favour of increased transparency in commercial arbitrations involving States or state-owned entities.
  • 61% of respondents thought that arbitrators should be more interventionist when faced with an under-represented or poorly represented party. 
  • 72% of respondents thought the arbitration process would benefit from additional best practice guidelines for the conduct of arbitrations involving allegations of corruption.

Meet The Team

Meet The Team

Meet The Team

This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.