London

London

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Governor's House
5 Laurence Pountney Hill
London, EC4R 0BR
United Kingdom

Get Directions

Located in one of the world’s key financial, business, and commercial property centres, our London office brings together more than 300 lawyers who advise over 25 FTSE 100 companies and over 80 Global Fortune 500 clients. The team delivers full-service legal counsel across the City, the UK, and internationally, combining deep sector knowledge with practical experience across corporate, finance, real estate, litigation, and regulatory law.

These cross-border matters, spanning 150+ jurisdictions, are coordinated seamlessly with colleagues across our global offices and through a non-exclusive network of preferred law firms worldwide. This collaborative model ensures clients receive consistent, high-quality advice wherever their business operates.

Our London practice ranks among the top twenty law firms by London revenue, reflecting the strength of our client relationships and the calibre of work undertaken. The office continues to advise on some of the market’s most complex transactions and disputes in areas such as:

  • Real Estate
  • Finance
  • Corporate Finance
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Tax
  • Regulatory
  • Commercial
  • Employment
  • Competition
  • Restructuring
  • Energy and many more disciplines

Our Community

In London, we work with a number of schools, colleges and not-for-profit organisations to provide opportunities, skills training and advice to young people from age 5 to 18 aimed at raising aspirations,  giving the students an insight into the world of work and helping them to develop essential skills.

We have since 2007 been working with Manor Stratford Primary, a school in one of the city’s most disadvantaged boroughs, including running a weekly volunteer reading scheme, annual ‘world of work’ days at our office, sponsoring and helping to deliver an enterprise programme and helping to subsidise the cost of school trips.

Career Kick Start is our annual two week social mobility work experience programme, designed to provide 20 Year 12 students (aged 16-17) from non-advantaged backgrounds with a detailed understanding of life as a commercial lawyer.  The first week of the programme is spent at BCLP in a mix of work shadowing, skills workshops and insight sessions.  The second week is run in partnership with the Social Mobility Business Partnership, and the students participate in a series of one-day insight days, each hosted by a different BCLP client.  We pay all participants the London Living Wage for the duration of the programme.

We are members of Young Enterprise, the UK's leading business and enterprise education charity.  We host the annual regional finals of their flagship Companies Programme and volunteers from BCLP and our clients also volunteer to help deliver Young Enterprise programmes in schools and colleges, including CV and interview skills masterclasses.

We are long term supporters of East End Community Foundation, and are one of the funders of EECF’s Life Chances Fund, an innovative multi-borough giving scheme that funds frontline organisations and community groups to provide essential support to enrich the lives of residents across the East End.

In our UK offices, we run regular Donate Our Time (“DOT”) days, combining workgroup teambuilding with volunteering in the community, in a variety of ways - including working with food poverty charities and creating and maintaining community open spaces.  We are always happy to organise joint BCLP/client DOT days.

We have an active charity fundraising programme.  Through an internal nomination and selection process, our UK offices choose a charity to support each year. For 2025, our UK charity of the year is Pancreatic Cancer UK, supporting anyone affected by pancreatic cancer, whether it is before, during or after a diagnosis, through treatment or support during end-of-life care. They also fund important world leading research, such as detection tests and cancer-killing therapies, and campaign to spread awareness about this disease, for faster and more accurate diagnosis and treatment. In addition to running events and challenges in aid of our Charity of the Year, we also run fundraising events and collections in kind for other charities, tackling issues such as access to justice and food poverty.

 

2025 UK Pay Gap report

2025 UK Pay Gap report

BCLP’s eighth year of reporting

In line with 2017 UK regulations. BCLP has voluntarily included partnership figures and ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation pay in order to further increase transparency in our reporting.

Download the report Download the report

Meet The Team

Jinal Shah
Jinal Shah
+44 (0) 20 3400 4034

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 04, 2026

Cyber Litigation in Financial Services: managing the evolving risk

Cyber incidents are increasingly giving rise to complex, long‑tail litigation risk, particularly for financial services firms. As regulators place growing emphasis on operational resilience, outsourcing governance and accountability, the same regulatory findings may be repurposed to support civil follow‑on claims long after incidents occur. Regulatory investigations are taking longer to conclude and, alongside damages claims, courts are showing an increased willingness to grant urgent injunctive relief to prevent data misuse. As a result, firms should approach cyber preparedness not only as a regulatory or operational issue, but as a litigation risk mitigation exercise – aligning regulatory engagement, disclosure decisions and contractual liability planning from the outset. This article is the second in our three‑part Emerging Themes in Financial Regulation & Disputes 2026 series and follows our earlier analysis of cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift. It examines the evolving litigation and regulatory landscape shaping cyber and operational resilience expectations for the year ahead and identifies practical priorities for financial services firms seeking to respond proactively. Our accompanying articles consider (i) cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift; and (ii) operational resilience and the growing influence of critical third‑party designations.
Insights
Jun 04, 2026

LIDW 2026 | Bridging Steppes and Standards: Kazakhstan's Evolving Dispute Landscape

On day 3 of London International Disputes Week (LIDW) 2026, BCLP and co-sponsors BrKLA and BKS Disputes, were delighted to host a panel discussion on the rapidly evolving dispute resolution landscape in Kazakhstan.
Insights
May 29, 2026

Christine Graham Joins American Bar Association ALS Panel on National Security, Antitrust and Trade Law

BCLP Partner, Christine Graham, recently participated in the international webinar “National Security, Antitrust and Trade Law”, hosted by the American Bar Association’s Antitrust Foreign Investment and National Security Committee on 28 May 2026.
Insights
May 29, 2026

Mace v Baltic – Key Issues

Judgment in the case of Mace Construct Ltd v Baltic Investment Holdings Ltd [2026] EWHC 976 (TCC) was handed down on 28 April 2026. This case is particularly interesting for two main reasons: it deals with priority of Contract Documents in the JCT form, with a particular focus on whether a Schedule of Derogations (contract clarifications) takes precedence over the Schedule of Amendments; and it appears to endorse a prospective approach to delay analysis for extension of time (EOT) claims pre-dating completion.
Insights
May 28, 2026

Further curbs on the judicial review of NSIPs announced

New judicial review proposals for nationally important infrastructure schemes have been announced for consultation by the Treasury, as part of the Government’s ongoing infrastructure planning reforms to speed up the consenting and delivery of infrastructure projects to drive growth.  These are in addition to, and go further than, the judicial review reforms in the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 which reduce the number of attempts a claimant can make to bring a legal challenge to a Development Consent Order.  Those reforms came into force earlier this year. In summary, two new optional mechanisms will be introduced to protect consented infrastructure schemes from unnecessary delays caused by judicial review (JR): A parliamentary authorisation mechanism to give a DCO the same protections as an Act of Parliament which would reduce exposure from JR on all but human rights grounds.  It would be available only to a narrow category of the most critical clean energy projects identified on a case-by-case basis by the Energy Secretary as being of Critical National Importance (CNI) and endorsed by Members of Parliament. The normal DCO process for submission and examination would be followed, but the final decision put before the House of Commons, and a vote held. If approved, the DCO would be afforded a distinct statutory status specified in the underpinning legislation, similar to an Act of Parliament, protecting it from judicial review on issues other than human rights grounds. A challenge window mechanism, for all other NSIPs, including transport and water projects.  The fixed legal challenge window would be updated to allow the Secretary of State (SoS) to address potential legitimate issues before finalising a consent, along with limits on the ability of potential claimants to raise other issues after publication of the final DCO.  The SoS would publish the draft decision, after which the JR period would open. The Secretary of State would then have a period in which s(he) could consider and address issues raised before amending a final DCO. As a consequence, if any JR on the same grounds were subsequently pursued, the Courts would have a clearer basis to refuse permission or relief, making use of the new provisions introduced by the Planning and Infrastructure Act on meritless claims. The law would also be changed so that the courts could refuse permission for a JR to proceed on any issues not brought up during the consent process or challenge window. 
Insights
May 28, 2026

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: What you need to know

The International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) has revised its Arbitration Rules, effective from 1 June 2026. The new rules have been designed with a “client mindset” and specific focus on increased efficiency and clarity for end users. Clients consistently rank excessive cost and prolonged procedural delays as their biggest complaints about international arbitration. The new ICC Rules seek to address these complaints by removing procedural hurdles and introducing streamlined fast-track options.Here are the main things you need to know about the new rules:

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 04, 2026
Cyber Litigation in Financial Services: managing the evolving risk
Cyber incidents are increasingly giving rise to complex, long‑tail litigation risk, particularly for financial services firms. As regulators place growing emphasis on operational resilience, outsourcing governance and accountability, the same regulatory findings may be repurposed to support civil follow‑on claims long after incidents occur. Regulatory investigations are taking longer to conclude and, alongside damages claims, courts are showing an increased willingness to grant urgent injunctive relief to prevent data misuse. As a result, firms should approach cyber preparedness not only as a regulatory or operational issue, but as a litigation risk mitigation exercise – aligning regulatory engagement, disclosure decisions and contractual liability planning from the outset. This article is the second in our three‑part Emerging Themes in Financial Regulation & Disputes 2026 series and follows our earlier analysis of cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift. It examines the evolving litigation and regulatory landscape shaping cyber and operational resilience expectations for the year ahead and identifies practical priorities for financial services firms seeking to respond proactively. Our accompanying articles consider (i) cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift; and (ii) operational resilience and the growing influence of critical third‑party designations.
Insights
Jun 04, 2026
LIDW 2026 | Bridging Steppes and Standards: Kazakhstan's Evolving Dispute Landscape
On day 3 of London International Disputes Week (LIDW) 2026, BCLP and co-sponsors BrKLA and BKS Disputes, were delighted to host a panel discussion on the rapidly evolving dispute resolution landscape in Kazakhstan.
Insights
Jun 02, 2026
Dealing with employee grievances in an AI-enabled world
Insights
May 29, 2026
Christine Graham Joins American Bar Association ALS Panel on National Security, Antitrust and Trade Law
BCLP Partner, Christine Graham, recently participated in the international webinar “National Security, Antitrust and Trade Law”, hosted by the American Bar Association’s Antitrust Foreign Investment and National Security Committee on 28 May 2026.
Insights
May 29, 2026
Mace v Baltic – Key Issues
Judgment in the case of Mace Construct Ltd v Baltic Investment Holdings Ltd [2026] EWHC 976 (TCC) was handed down on 28 April 2026. This case is particularly interesting for two main reasons: it deals with priority of Contract Documents in the JCT form, with a particular focus on whether a Schedule of Derogations (contract clarifications) takes precedence over the Schedule of Amendments; and it appears to endorse a prospective approach to delay analysis for extension of time (EOT) claims pre-dating completion.
News
May 28, 2026
BCLP advises Specialfastigheter on establishment of EUR4.5bn Euro Medium Term Note Program
Insights
May 28, 2026
Further curbs on the judicial review of NSIPs announced
New judicial review proposals for nationally important infrastructure schemes have been announced for consultation by the Treasury, as part of the Government’s ongoing infrastructure planning reforms to speed up the consenting and delivery of infrastructure projects to drive growth.  These are in addition to, and go further than, the judicial review reforms in the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 which reduce the number of attempts a claimant can make to bring a legal challenge to a Development Consent Order.  Those reforms came into force earlier this year. In summary, two new optional mechanisms will be introduced to protect consented infrastructure schemes from unnecessary delays caused by judicial review (JR): A parliamentary authorisation mechanism to give a DCO the same protections as an Act of Parliament which would reduce exposure from JR on all but human rights grounds.  It would be available only to a narrow category of the most critical clean energy projects identified on a case-by-case basis by the Energy Secretary as being of Critical National Importance (CNI) and endorsed by Members of Parliament. The normal DCO process for submission and examination would be followed, but the final decision put before the House of Commons, and a vote held. If approved, the DCO would be afforded a distinct statutory status specified in the underpinning legislation, similar to an Act of Parliament, protecting it from judicial review on issues other than human rights grounds. A challenge window mechanism, for all other NSIPs, including transport and water projects.  The fixed legal challenge window would be updated to allow the Secretary of State (SoS) to address potential legitimate issues before finalising a consent, along with limits on the ability of potential claimants to raise other issues after publication of the final DCO.  The SoS would publish the draft decision, after which the JR period would open. The Secretary of State would then have a period in which s(he) could consider and address issues raised before amending a final DCO. As a consequence, if any JR on the same grounds were subsequently pursued, the Courts would have a clearer basis to refuse permission or relief, making use of the new provisions introduced by the Planning and Infrastructure Act on meritless claims. The law would also be changed so that the courts could refuse permission for a JR to proceed on any issues not brought up during the consent process or challenge window. 
Insights
May 28, 2026
ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: What you need to know
The International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) has revised its Arbitration Rules, effective from 1 June 2026. The new rules have been designed with a “client mindset” and specific focus on increased efficiency and clarity for end users. Clients consistently rank excessive cost and prolonged procedural delays as their biggest complaints about international arbitration. The new ICC Rules seek to address these complaints by removing procedural hurdles and introducing streamlined fast-track options.Here are the main things you need to know about the new rules:
Insights
May 18, 2026
“Making the Pot Last Longer" - Co-Investment as an Essential Financing Tool for Private Equity Sponsors