London

London

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Governor's House
5 Laurence Pountney Hill
London, EC4R 0BR
United Kingdom

Get Directions

Located in one of the world’s key financial, business, and commercial property centres, our London office brings together more than 300 lawyers who advise over 25 FTSE 100 companies and over 80 Global Fortune 500 clients. The team delivers full-service legal counsel across the City, the UK, and internationally, combining deep sector knowledge with practical experience across corporate, finance, real estate, litigation, and regulatory law.

These cross-border matters, spanning 150+ jurisdictions, are coordinated seamlessly with colleagues across our global offices and through a non-exclusive network of preferred law firms worldwide. This collaborative model ensures clients receive consistent, high-quality advice wherever their business operates.

Our London practice ranks among the top twenty law firms by London revenue, reflecting the strength of our client relationships and the calibre of work undertaken. The office continues to advise on some of the market’s most complex transactions and disputes in areas such as:

  • Real Estate
  • Finance
  • Corporate Finance
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Tax
  • Regulatory
  • Commercial
  • Employment
  • Competition
  • Restructuring
  • Energy and many more disciplines

Our Community

In London, we work with a number of schools, colleges and not-for-profit organisations to provide opportunities, skills training and advice to young people from age 5 to 18 aimed at raising aspirations,  giving the students an insight into the world of work and helping them to develop essential skills.

We have since 2007 been working with Manor Stratford Primary, a school in one of the city’s most disadvantaged boroughs, including running a weekly volunteer reading scheme, annual ‘world of work’ days at our office, sponsoring and helping to deliver an enterprise programme and helping to subsidise the cost of school trips.

Career Kick Start is our annual two week social mobility work experience programme, designed to provide 20 Year 12 students (aged 16-17) from non-advantaged backgrounds with a detailed understanding of life as a commercial lawyer.  The first week of the programme is spent at BCLP in a mix of work shadowing, skills workshops and insight sessions.  The second week is run in partnership with the Social Mobility Business Partnership, and the students participate in a series of one-day insight days, each hosted by a different BCLP client.  We pay all participants the London Living Wage for the duration of the programme.

We are members of Young Enterprise, the UK's leading business and enterprise education charity.  We host the annual regional finals of their flagship Companies Programme and volunteers from BCLP and our clients also volunteer to help deliver Young Enterprise programmes in schools and colleges, including CV and interview skills masterclasses.

We are long term supporters of East End Community Foundation, and are one of the funders of EECF’s Life Chances Fund, an innovative multi-borough giving scheme that funds frontline organisations and community groups to provide essential support to enrich the lives of residents across the East End.

In our UK offices, we run regular Donate Our Time (“DOT”) days, combining workgroup teambuilding with volunteering in the community, in a variety of ways - including working with food poverty charities and creating and maintaining community open spaces.  We are always happy to organise joint BCLP/client DOT days.

We have an active charity fundraising programme.  Through an internal nomination and selection process, our UK offices choose a charity to support each year. For 2025, our UK charity of the year is Pancreatic Cancer UK, supporting anyone affected by pancreatic cancer, whether it is before, during or after a diagnosis, through treatment or support during end-of-life care. They also fund important world leading research, such as detection tests and cancer-killing therapies, and campaign to spread awareness about this disease, for faster and more accurate diagnosis and treatment. In addition to running events and challenges in aid of our Charity of the Year, we also run fundraising events and collections in kind for other charities, tackling issues such as access to justice and food poverty.

 

2025 UK Pay Gap report

2025 UK Pay Gap report

BCLP’s eighth year of reporting

In line with 2017 UK regulations. BCLP has voluntarily included partnership figures and ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation pay in order to further increase transparency in our reporting.

Download the report Download the report

Meet The Team

Jinal Shah
Jinal Shah
+44 (0) 20 3400 4034

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 18, 2026

A crash-course guide to navigating insolvency in construction supply chains

With the ever present issues of price escalation, availability of materials and the general state of the world, it seems timely to address some of the key issues in dealing with insolvencies in the construction supply chain. Whilst lawyers are often accused of being ‘doomsday preppers’, according to the Insolvency Service the total number of construction firms becoming insolvent in the 12 months to March 2026 was 3,827. This article pulls together a crash course list of key issues to consider where there may be insolvency in your construction supply chain through the lens of the employer.
Insights
Jun 17, 2026

NEC, adjudication and natural justice

A recent decision on whether an adjudication decision should be enforced provides a good example of the practical issues that can come up when operating the NEC form of contract. This is what the court had to address in Premier Modular Ltd v Maidstone And Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 1404 (TCC) where the adjudication concerned an entitlement to an extension of time, based on what was the correct compensation event, was it notified on time and what was the Accepted Programme to be used for assessing delay?
Insights
Jun 17, 2026

PCSA liabilities do not always fall away: lessons from Belong v Seddon

In this BCLP Insight, Zaynah Mirza takes a look at the case of Belong (Construction) Ltd v Seddon Construction Ltd [2026] EWHC 1275 (TCC) where the Technology and Construction Court considered what happens to liabilities that arise under a pre-construction services agreement (PCSA) before the transition to a building contract and whether a contractor can walk away from a breach committed during the PCSA period simply because the relevant obligation did not appear in the final building contract.
Insights
Jun 16, 2026

Contractual Controls Register: what the new Regulations mean for your deals

On 8 June 2026, the Government made the Provision of Information (Contractual Control) (Registered Land) Regulations 2026 which form the statutory framework for the new Contractual Controls Register. Contractual controls are rights that give a party the ability to control how and when land is transferred, without conferring legal ownership. They are widely used, particularly by developers and land promoters. The register, which is due to be launched by the Land Registry on 6 April 2027, is designed to increase transparency in the property market.
Insights
Jun 10, 2026

Late payments consultation response: significant changes coming for the construction industry

In this BCLP Insight, first published in PLC Construction, Jack McFadden considers the government's proposals for tackling late payments, including its proposal to ban the practice of deducting and withholding retention payments under the terms of a construction contract.
Insights
Jun 09, 2026

Spec 1 Limited & Ors v The Export-Import Bank of China: Squaring the Circle of Asymmetric Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses

The High Court in Spec 1 & Ors v Export-Import Bank of China [2026] EQHC 1162 (Comm) analysed the principles governing asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clauses, emphasising that such clauses in finance documentation must be interpreted in light of their commercial purpose, namely that of facilitating the lender’s enforcement against the borrower’s assets.  The High Court held that the asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clause in this case permitted parallel proceedings in England and Singapore. Accordingly, the Borrowers could pursue their claims in England and the Lender could pursue its claims in Singapore. The Court nevertheless urged the parties to exercise their “common sense” and show more “willingness to cooperate” by finding their “own path to pragmatism” and avoiding the “forensic gamesmanship” which had led to the parallel proceedings in England and Singapore.
Insights
Jun 08, 2026

EU Formally Adopts Revised FDI Screening Regulation

The EU has completed the legislative process for its revised foreign direct investment screening framework (the “Revised EU FDI Regulation”), with the Council formally adopting the Revised EU FDI Regulation today (8 June 2026) following its approval by the European Parliament last month.
Insights
Jun 04, 2026

Cyber Litigation in Financial Services: managing the evolving risk

Cyber incidents are increasingly giving rise to complex, long‑tail litigation risk, particularly for financial services firms. As regulators place growing emphasis on operational resilience, outsourcing governance and accountability, the same regulatory findings may be repurposed to support civil follow‑on claims long after incidents occur. Regulatory investigations are taking longer to conclude and, alongside damages claims, courts are showing an increased willingness to grant urgent injunctive relief to prevent data misuse. As a result, firms should approach cyber preparedness not only as a regulatory or operational issue, but as a litigation risk mitigation exercise – aligning regulatory engagement, disclosure decisions and contractual liability planning from the outset. This article is the second in our three‑part Emerging Themes in Financial Regulation & Disputes 2026 series and follows our earlier analysis of cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift. It examines the evolving litigation and regulatory landscape shaping cyber and operational resilience expectations for the year ahead and identifies practical priorities for financial services firms seeking to respond proactively. Our accompanying articles consider (i) cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift; and (ii) operational resilience and the growing influence of critical third‑party designations.

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 18, 2026
A crash-course guide to navigating insolvency in construction supply chains
With the ever present issues of price escalation, availability of materials and the general state of the world, it seems timely to address some of the key issues in dealing with insolvencies in the construction supply chain. Whilst lawyers are often accused of being ‘doomsday preppers’, according to the Insolvency Service the total number of construction firms becoming insolvent in the 12 months to March 2026 was 3,827. This article pulls together a crash course list of key issues to consider where there may be insolvency in your construction supply chain through the lens of the employer.
Insights
Jun 17, 2026
NEC, adjudication and natural justice
A recent decision on whether an adjudication decision should be enforced provides a good example of the practical issues that can come up when operating the NEC form of contract. This is what the court had to address in Premier Modular Ltd v Maidstone And Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 1404 (TCC) where the adjudication concerned an entitlement to an extension of time, based on what was the correct compensation event, was it notified on time and what was the Accepted Programme to be used for assessing delay?
Insights
Jun 17, 2026
PCSA liabilities do not always fall away: lessons from Belong v Seddon
In this BCLP Insight, Zaynah Mirza takes a look at the case of Belong (Construction) Ltd v Seddon Construction Ltd [2026] EWHC 1275 (TCC) where the Technology and Construction Court considered what happens to liabilities that arise under a pre-construction services agreement (PCSA) before the transition to a building contract and whether a contractor can walk away from a breach committed during the PCSA period simply because the relevant obligation did not appear in the final building contract.
Insights
Jun 16, 2026
Contractual Controls Register: what the new Regulations mean for your deals
On 8 June 2026, the Government made the Provision of Information (Contractual Control) (Registered Land) Regulations 2026 which form the statutory framework for the new Contractual Controls Register. Contractual controls are rights that give a party the ability to control how and when land is transferred, without conferring legal ownership. They are widely used, particularly by developers and land promoters. The register, which is due to be launched by the Land Registry on 6 April 2027, is designed to increase transparency in the property market.
News
Jun 15, 2026
BCLP supports CLC’s Mental Health Joint Code of Practice
Insights
Jun 10, 2026
Late payments consultation response: significant changes coming for the construction industry
In this BCLP Insight, first published in PLC Construction, Jack McFadden considers the government's proposals for tackling late payments, including its proposal to ban the practice of deducting and withholding retention payments under the terms of a construction contract.
Insights
Jun 09, 2026
Spec 1 Limited & Ors v The Export-Import Bank of China: Squaring the Circle of Asymmetric Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses
The High Court in Spec 1 & Ors v Export-Import Bank of China [2026] EQHC 1162 (Comm) analysed the principles governing asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clauses, emphasising that such clauses in finance documentation must be interpreted in light of their commercial purpose, namely that of facilitating the lender’s enforcement against the borrower’s assets.  The High Court held that the asymmetric exclusive jurisdiction clause in this case permitted parallel proceedings in England and Singapore. Accordingly, the Borrowers could pursue their claims in England and the Lender could pursue its claims in Singapore. The Court nevertheless urged the parties to exercise their “common sense” and show more “willingness to cooperate” by finding their “own path to pragmatism” and avoiding the “forensic gamesmanship” which had led to the parallel proceedings in England and Singapore.
Insights
Jun 08, 2026
EU Formally Adopts Revised FDI Screening Regulation
The EU has completed the legislative process for its revised foreign direct investment screening framework (the “Revised EU FDI Regulation”), with the Council formally adopting the Revised EU FDI Regulation today (8 June 2026) following its approval by the European Parliament last month.
Insights
Jun 04, 2026
Cyber Litigation in Financial Services: managing the evolving risk
Cyber incidents are increasingly giving rise to complex, long‑tail litigation risk, particularly for financial services firms. As regulators place growing emphasis on operational resilience, outsourcing governance and accountability, the same regulatory findings may be repurposed to support civil follow‑on claims long after incidents occur. Regulatory investigations are taking longer to conclude and, alongside damages claims, courts are showing an increased willingness to grant urgent injunctive relief to prevent data misuse. As a result, firms should approach cyber preparedness not only as a regulatory or operational issue, but as a litigation risk mitigation exercise – aligning regulatory engagement, disclosure decisions and contractual liability planning from the outset. This article is the second in our three‑part Emerging Themes in Financial Regulation & Disputes 2026 series and follows our earlier analysis of cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift. It examines the evolving litigation and regulatory landscape shaping cyber and operational resilience expectations for the year ahead and identifies practical priorities for financial services firms seeking to respond proactively. Our accompanying articles consider (i) cyber resilience and the 2026 regulatory shift; and (ii) operational resilience and the growing influence of critical third‑party designations.