London

London

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Governor's House
5 Laurence Pountney Hill
London, EC4R 0BR
United Kingdom

Get Directions

Located in one of the world’s key financial, business, and commercial property centres, our London office brings together more than 300 lawyers who advise over 25 FTSE 100 companies and over 80 Global Fortune 500 clients. The team delivers full-service legal counsel across the City, the UK, and internationally, combining deep sector knowledge with practical experience across corporate, finance, real estate, litigation, and regulatory law.

These cross-border matters, spanning 150+ jurisdictions, are coordinated seamlessly with colleagues across our global offices and through a non-exclusive network of preferred law firms worldwide. This collaborative model ensures clients receive consistent, high-quality advice wherever their business operates.

Our London practice ranks among the top twenty law firms by London revenue, reflecting the strength of our client relationships and the calibre of work undertaken. The office continues to advise on some of the market’s most complex transactions and disputes in areas such as:

  • Real Estate
  • Finance
  • Corporate Finance
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Tax
  • Regulatory
  • Commercial
  • Employment
  • Competition
  • Restructuring
  • Energy and many more disciplines

In London, we work with a number of schools, colleges and not-for-profit organisations to provide opportunities, skills training and advice to young people from age 5 to 18 aimed at raising aspirations,  giving the students an insight into the world of work and helping them to develop essential skills.

We have since 2007 been working with Manor Stratford Primary, a school in one of the city’s most disadvantaged boroughs, including running a weekly volunteer reading scheme, annual ‘world of work’ days at our office, sponsoring and helping to deliver an enterprise programme and helping to subsidise the cost of school trips.

Career Kick Start is our annual two week social mobility work experience programme, designed to provide 20 Year 12 students (aged 16-17) from non-advantaged backgrounds with a detailed understanding of life as a commercial lawyer.  The first week of the programme is spent at BCLP in a mix of work shadowing, skills workshops and insight sessions.  The second week is run in partnership with the Social Mobility Business Partnership, and the students participate in a series of one-day insight days, each hosted by a different BCLP client.  We pay all participants the London Living Wage for the duration of the programme.

We are members of Young Enterprise, the UK's leading business and enterprise education charity.  We host the annual regional finals of their flagship Companies Programme and volunteers from BCLP and our clients also volunteer to help deliver Young Enterprise programmes in schools and colleges, including CV and interview skills masterclasses.

We are long term supporters of East End Community Foundation, and are one of the funders of EECF’s Life Chances Fund, an innovative multi-borough giving scheme that funds frontline organisations and community groups to provide essential support to enrich the lives of residents across the East End.

In our UK offices, we run regular Donate Our Time (“DOT”) days, combining workgroup teambuilding with volunteering in the community, in a variety of ways - including working with food poverty charities and creating and maintaining community open spaces.  We are always happy to organise joint BCLP/client DOT days.

We have an active charity fundraising programme.  Through an internal nomination and selection process, our UK offices choose a charity to support each year. For 2025, our UK charity of the year is Pancreatic Cancer UK, supporting anyone affected by pancreatic cancer, whether it is before, during or after a diagnosis, through treatment or support during end-of-life care. They also fund important world leading research, such as detection tests and cancer-killing therapies, and campaign to spread awareness about this disease, for faster and more accurate diagnosis and treatment. In addition to running events and challenges in aid of our Charity of the Year, we also run fundraising events and collections in kind for other charities, tackling issues such as access to justice and food poverty.

Meet The Team

Jinal Shah
Jinal Shah
+44 (0) 20 3400 4034

Related Insights

Insights
Mar 16, 2026

Latest Development in the USD 50 Billion Yukos Saga

On 2 March 2026, Mr Justice Bright of the English Commercial Court dismissed Russia’s objections to enforcement of arbitration awards worth more than USD 50 billion in favour of the former shareholders of Yukos. Russia only succeeded in preventing the enforcement of costs awarded to the Yukos shareholders in the arbitrations, which totalled c. USD 50 million plus interest. This first instance judgment by the English court is another setback for Russia in the Yukos saga since the Dutch Supreme Court’s conclusive dismissal in October 2025 of its attempt to set aside the awards. In addition, Mr Justice Bright took this opportunity to provide important clarifications on the principles and approaches applicable in considering a public policy objection to enforcement under section 103(3) of the Arbitration Act of 1996. In confirming and summarising the pro-enforcement regime of the English courts, Mr Justice Bright commented that: “…litigation of this kind is not a moral beauty contest. Despite the references above to public policy and universal morality, it has not been the function of this judgment to grade either [the former shareholders of Yukos] or the Russian Federation for morality; nor for beauty. In investor-state disputes, these qualities are not always present in abundance. The New York Convention and the implementing provisions in ss. 101-103 of the Arbitration Act 1996 are inherently pro-enforcement. Within the parameters set by the authorities that I have discussed, they can be relied on by sinners, no less than by saints. It is difficult for any defendant to resist enforcement of a valid New York Convention arbitration award; especially when (as here) the jurisdiction of the Tribunal is no longer open to challenge. The moral failings that the Russian Federation has alleged… whether or not they could be made out at trial, are simply incapable of affording any defence – save to the very limited extent that I have indicated in relation to costs.” This note provides a brief background of the dispute between Russia and the Yukos shareholders. It focuses on Mr Justice Bright’s articulation of the applicable principles to section 103(3) of the Arbitration Act and their wider implication for parties looking to rely on allegations of fraud, corruption or illegalities in resisting enforcement of an arbitration award under the New York Convention.
Insights
Mar 06, 2026

Paragon Group Limited v FK Facades Limited – Assignees and Adjudication

In this BCLP Insight, Isaac Dundas reviews the recent decision of Paragon Group Limited v FK Facades Limited [2026] EWHC 78 (TCC). Here, the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) had to determine whether an assignee of a building contract had the right to refer a dispute to adjudication.
Insights
Mar 03, 2026

The rise of strategic joint ventures and alternative structures in data centre investment

The UK data centre sector has evolved into one of the most competitive and capital-intensive asset classes across global real estate and infrastructure. Delivering a single hyperscale facility, often requiring more than half a billion pounds of investment—alongside intense competition for powered land and lengthy grid connection timelines, has made the traditional single-developer financing model unsustainable. In response, a new era of, strategic partnerships have emerged. The market is dominated by complex joint ventures and alternative investment structures, designed to pool capital, allocate risks, and align the interests of specialist developers, institutional investors, and hyperscale tenants.

Related Insights

Insights
Mar 16, 2026
Latest Development in the USD 50 Billion Yukos Saga
On 2 March 2026, Mr Justice Bright of the English Commercial Court dismissed Russia’s objections to enforcement of arbitration awards worth more than USD 50 billion in favour of the former shareholders of Yukos. Russia only succeeded in preventing the enforcement of costs awarded to the Yukos shareholders in the arbitrations, which totalled c. USD 50 million plus interest. This first instance judgment by the English court is another setback for Russia in the Yukos saga since the Dutch Supreme Court’s conclusive dismissal in October 2025 of its attempt to set aside the awards. In addition, Mr Justice Bright took this opportunity to provide important clarifications on the principles and approaches applicable in considering a public policy objection to enforcement under section 103(3) of the Arbitration Act of 1996. In confirming and summarising the pro-enforcement regime of the English courts, Mr Justice Bright commented that: “…litigation of this kind is not a moral beauty contest. Despite the references above to public policy and universal morality, it has not been the function of this judgment to grade either [the former shareholders of Yukos] or the Russian Federation for morality; nor for beauty. In investor-state disputes, these qualities are not always present in abundance. The New York Convention and the implementing provisions in ss. 101-103 of the Arbitration Act 1996 are inherently pro-enforcement. Within the parameters set by the authorities that I have discussed, they can be relied on by sinners, no less than by saints. It is difficult for any defendant to resist enforcement of a valid New York Convention arbitration award; especially when (as here) the jurisdiction of the Tribunal is no longer open to challenge. The moral failings that the Russian Federation has alleged… whether or not they could be made out at trial, are simply incapable of affording any defence – save to the very limited extent that I have indicated in relation to costs.” This note provides a brief background of the dispute between Russia and the Yukos shareholders. It focuses on Mr Justice Bright’s articulation of the applicable principles to section 103(3) of the Arbitration Act and their wider implication for parties looking to rely on allegations of fraud, corruption or illegalities in resisting enforcement of an arbitration award under the New York Convention.
Insights
Mar 11, 2026
Floating charges and the challenge of cross-Atlantic lending
Insights
Mar 11, 2026
Streamlining building control for telecoms: Key takeaways from the government's consultation
News
Mar 06, 2026
BCLP advises PGIM on €325 Million Refinancing of German Retail Portfolio
Insights
Mar 06, 2026
Paragon Group Limited v FK Facades Limited – Assignees and Adjudication
In this BCLP Insight, Isaac Dundas reviews the recent decision of Paragon Group Limited v FK Facades Limited [2026] EWHC 78 (TCC). Here, the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) had to determine whether an assignee of a building contract had the right to refer a dispute to adjudication.
News
Mar 05, 2026
BCLP advises Constellation Automotive on CMA Phase 2 Clearance for Aston Barclay Acquisition
News
Mar 05, 2026
BCLP expands real estate offering with London partner hire
Insights
Mar 05, 2026
Is the UK leveraged finance market fast becoming Americanized?
Insights
Mar 03, 2026
The rise of strategic joint ventures and alternative structures in data centre investment
The UK data centre sector has evolved into one of the most competitive and capital-intensive asset classes across global real estate and infrastructure. Delivering a single hyperscale facility, often requiring more than half a billion pounds of investment—alongside intense competition for powered land and lengthy grid connection timelines, has made the traditional single-developer financing model unsustainable. In response, a new era of, strategic partnerships have emerged. The market is dominated by complex joint ventures and alternative investment structures, designed to pool capital, allocate risks, and align the interests of specialist developers, institutional investors, and hyperscale tenants.