London

London

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Governor's House
5 Laurence Pountney Hill
London, EC4R 0BR
United Kingdom

Get Directions

Located in one of the world’s key financial, business, and commercial property centres, our London office brings together more than 300 lawyers who advise over 25 FTSE 100 companies and over 80 Global Fortune 500 clients. The team delivers full-service legal counsel across the City, the UK, and internationally, combining deep sector knowledge with practical experience across corporate, finance, real estate, litigation, and regulatory law.

These cross-border matters, spanning 150+ jurisdictions, are coordinated seamlessly with colleagues across our global offices and through a non-exclusive network of preferred law firms worldwide. This collaborative model ensures clients receive consistent, high-quality advice wherever their business operates.

Our London practice ranks among the top twenty law firms by London revenue, reflecting the strength of our client relationships and the calibre of work undertaken. The office continues to advise on some of the market’s most complex transactions and disputes in areas such as:

  • Real Estate
  • Finance
  • Corporate Finance
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Tax
  • Regulatory
  • Commercial
  • Employment
  • Competition
  • Restructuring
  • Energy and many more disciplines

Our Community

In London, we work with a number of schools, colleges and not-for-profit organisations to provide opportunities, skills training and advice to young people from age 5 to 18 aimed at raising aspirations,  giving the students an insight into the world of work and helping them to develop essential skills.

We have since 2007 been working with Manor Stratford Primary, a school in one of the city’s most disadvantaged boroughs, including running a weekly volunteer reading scheme, annual ‘world of work’ days at our office, sponsoring and helping to deliver an enterprise programme and helping to subsidise the cost of school trips.

Career Kick Start is our annual two week social mobility work experience programme, designed to provide 20 Year 12 students (aged 16-17) from non-advantaged backgrounds with a detailed understanding of life as a commercial lawyer.  The first week of the programme is spent at BCLP in a mix of work shadowing, skills workshops and insight sessions.  The second week is run in partnership with the Social Mobility Business Partnership, and the students participate in a series of one-day insight days, each hosted by a different BCLP client.  We pay all participants the London Living Wage for the duration of the programme.

We are members of Young Enterprise, the UK's leading business and enterprise education charity.  We host the annual regional finals of their flagship Companies Programme and volunteers from BCLP and our clients also volunteer to help deliver Young Enterprise programmes in schools and colleges, including CV and interview skills masterclasses.

We are long term supporters of East End Community Foundation, and are one of the funders of EECF’s Life Chances Fund, an innovative multi-borough giving scheme that funds frontline organisations and community groups to provide essential support to enrich the lives of residents across the East End.

In our UK offices, we run regular Donate Our Time (“DOT”) days, combining workgroup teambuilding with volunteering in the community, in a variety of ways - including working with food poverty charities and creating and maintaining community open spaces.  We are always happy to organise joint BCLP/client DOT days.

We have an active charity fundraising programme.  Through an internal nomination and selection process, our UK offices choose a charity to support each year. For 2025, our UK charity of the year is Pancreatic Cancer UK, supporting anyone affected by pancreatic cancer, whether it is before, during or after a diagnosis, through treatment or support during end-of-life care. They also fund important world leading research, such as detection tests and cancer-killing therapies, and campaign to spread awareness about this disease, for faster and more accurate diagnosis and treatment. In addition to running events and challenges in aid of our Charity of the Year, we also run fundraising events and collections in kind for other charities, tackling issues such as access to justice and food poverty.

 

2025 UK Pay Gap report

2025 UK Pay Gap report

BCLP’s eighth year of reporting

In line with 2017 UK regulations. BCLP has voluntarily included partnership figures and ethnicity, disability and sexual orientation pay in order to further increase transparency in our reporting.

Download the report Download the report

Meet The Team

Jinal Shah
Jinal Shah
+44 (0) 20 3400 4034

Related Insights

Insights
May 28, 2026

Further curbs on the judicial review of NSIPs announced

New judicial review proposals for nationally important infrastructure schemes have been announced for consultation by the Treasury, as part of the Government’s ongoing infrastructure planning reforms to speed up the consenting and delivery of infrastructure projects to drive growth.  These are in addition to, and go further than, the judicial review reforms in the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 which reduce the number of attempts a claimant can make to bring a legal challenge to a Development Consent Order.  Those reforms came into force earlier this year. In summary, two new optional mechanisms will be introduced to protect consented infrastructure schemes from unnecessary delays caused by judicial review (JR): A parliamentary authorisation mechanism to give a DCO the same protections as an Act of Parliament which would reduce exposure from JR on all but human rights grounds.  It would be available only to a narrow category of the most critical clean energy projects identified on a case-by-case basis by the Energy Secretary as being of Critical National Importance (CNI) and endorsed by Members of Parliament. The normal DCO process for submission and examination would be followed, but the final decision put before the House of Commons, and a vote held. If approved, the DCO would be afforded a distinct statutory status specified in the underpinning legislation, similar to an Act of Parliament, protecting it from judicial review on issues other than human rights grounds. A challenge window mechanism, for all other NSIPs, including transport and water projects.  The fixed legal challenge window would be updated to allow the Secretary of State (SoS) to address potential legitimate issues before finalising a consent, along with limits on the ability of potential claimants to raise other issues after publication of the final DCO.  The SoS would publish the draft decision, after which the JR period would open. The Secretary of State would then have a period in which s(he) could consider and address issues raised before amending a final DCO. As a consequence, if any JR on the same grounds were subsequently pursued, the Courts would have a clearer basis to refuse permission or relief, making use of the new provisions introduced by the Planning and Infrastructure Act on meritless claims. The law would also be changed so that the courts could refuse permission for a JR to proceed on any issues not brought up during the consent process or challenge window. 
Insights
May 28, 2026

ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: What you need to know

The International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) has revised its Arbitration Rules, effective from 1 June 2026. The new rules have been designed with a “client mindset” and specific focus on increased efficiency and clarity for end users. Clients consistently rank excessive cost and prolonged procedural delays as their biggest complaints about international arbitration. The new ICC Rules seek to address these complaints by removing procedural hurdles and introducing streamlined fast-track options.Here are the main things you need to know about the new rules:
Insights
May 08, 2026

The Draft EU Merger Guidelines – Key Takeaways for Dealmakers

On 30 April 2026, the European Commission released its much awaited draft merger guidelines (“Draft Guidelines”). The Draft Guidelines are intended to replace two current and dated guidance documents: the Commission’s Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2004) and its Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2008). The Draft Guidelines propose to bring the approach to European merger control into line with a changed geo-political, security and trade context, as well as reflecting other policy drivers that have become much more prominent since 2004 and 2008, such as innovation, resilience and sustainability. The release of the Draft Guidelines follows significant political pressure within the Commission to modernise the approach to merger control and help European businesses succeed on the world stage. The release of the Draft Guidelines – an area traditionally reserved to the Competition Commissioner and specialists within the Directorate General for Competition – has  been a key priority for Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who noted when the Draft Guidelines were released that they are intended to better support companies to thrive, scale and innovate, and to “meet the realities of the fiercely competitive global economy and boost our competitiveness, while preserving the predictability and certainty that investors value most in Europe.”
Insights
Apr 30, 2026

Can a conditional job offer be withdrawn after acceptance?

Job offers are frequently made “subject to” various conditions. The conditions might include satisfactory references, right to work checks or a medical examination. The nature of these conditions can become important where, for example, the prospective employer changes its mind and wants to withdraw the offer. It might be relatively painless to withdraw an offer of employment before it is accepted, but once it is accepted, can the prospective employer still withdraw the offer on the basis that the “subject to” conditions have not been fulfilled? 
Insights
Apr 30, 2026

Employment Rights Act 2025: Consultations, NDAs and TUPE in focus

Following on (mostly) from the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA), the government has this month introduced consultations, calls for evidence and guidelines.
Insights
Apr 30, 2026

Improving the building control process for Category A and B work on higher-risk buildings

In this article, first published in PLC Construction, Katharine Tulloch considers the government's consultation on proposals to improve the proportionality of the building control process for Category A and Category B building work on existing higher-risk buildings.

Related Insights

News
May 28, 2026
BCLP advises Specialfastigheter on establishment of EUR4.5bn Euro Medium Term Note Program
Insights
May 28, 2026
Further curbs on the judicial review of NSIPs announced
New judicial review proposals for nationally important infrastructure schemes have been announced for consultation by the Treasury, as part of the Government’s ongoing infrastructure planning reforms to speed up the consenting and delivery of infrastructure projects to drive growth.  These are in addition to, and go further than, the judicial review reforms in the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 which reduce the number of attempts a claimant can make to bring a legal challenge to a Development Consent Order.  Those reforms came into force earlier this year. In summary, two new optional mechanisms will be introduced to protect consented infrastructure schemes from unnecessary delays caused by judicial review (JR): A parliamentary authorisation mechanism to give a DCO the same protections as an Act of Parliament which would reduce exposure from JR on all but human rights grounds.  It would be available only to a narrow category of the most critical clean energy projects identified on a case-by-case basis by the Energy Secretary as being of Critical National Importance (CNI) and endorsed by Members of Parliament. The normal DCO process for submission and examination would be followed, but the final decision put before the House of Commons, and a vote held. If approved, the DCO would be afforded a distinct statutory status specified in the underpinning legislation, similar to an Act of Parliament, protecting it from judicial review on issues other than human rights grounds. A challenge window mechanism, for all other NSIPs, including transport and water projects.  The fixed legal challenge window would be updated to allow the Secretary of State (SoS) to address potential legitimate issues before finalising a consent, along with limits on the ability of potential claimants to raise other issues after publication of the final DCO.  The SoS would publish the draft decision, after which the JR period would open. The Secretary of State would then have a period in which s(he) could consider and address issues raised before amending a final DCO. As a consequence, if any JR on the same grounds were subsequently pursued, the Courts would have a clearer basis to refuse permission or relief, making use of the new provisions introduced by the Planning and Infrastructure Act on meritless claims. The law would also be changed so that the courts could refuse permission for a JR to proceed on any issues not brought up during the consent process or challenge window. 
Insights
May 28, 2026
ICC Arbitration Rules 2026: What you need to know
The International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) has revised its Arbitration Rules, effective from 1 June 2026. The new rules have been designed with a “client mindset” and specific focus on increased efficiency and clarity for end users. Clients consistently rank excessive cost and prolonged procedural delays as their biggest complaints about international arbitration. The new ICC Rules seek to address these complaints by removing procedural hurdles and introducing streamlined fast-track options.Here are the main things you need to know about the new rules:
Insights
May 18, 2026
“Making the Pot Last Longer" - Co-Investment as an Essential Financing Tool for Private Equity Sponsors
Insights
May 11, 2026
BCLP for CPI’s TechREG Chronicle: How Emerging Technologies Have Rewritten FDI Regimes
Insights
May 08, 2026
The Draft EU Merger Guidelines – Key Takeaways for Dealmakers
On 30 April 2026, the European Commission released its much awaited draft merger guidelines (“Draft Guidelines”). The Draft Guidelines are intended to replace two current and dated guidance documents: the Commission’s Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2004) and its Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines (published in 2008). The Draft Guidelines propose to bring the approach to European merger control into line with a changed geo-political, security and trade context, as well as reflecting other policy drivers that have become much more prominent since 2004 and 2008, such as innovation, resilience and sustainability. The release of the Draft Guidelines follows significant political pressure within the Commission to modernise the approach to merger control and help European businesses succeed on the world stage. The release of the Draft Guidelines – an area traditionally reserved to the Competition Commissioner and specialists within the Directorate General for Competition – has  been a key priority for Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who noted when the Draft Guidelines were released that they are intended to better support companies to thrive, scale and innovate, and to “meet the realities of the fiercely competitive global economy and boost our competitiveness, while preserving the predictability and certainty that investors value most in Europe.”
Insights
Apr 30, 2026
Can a conditional job offer be withdrawn after acceptance?
Job offers are frequently made “subject to” various conditions. The conditions might include satisfactory references, right to work checks or a medical examination. The nature of these conditions can become important where, for example, the prospective employer changes its mind and wants to withdraw the offer. It might be relatively painless to withdraw an offer of employment before it is accepted, but once it is accepted, can the prospective employer still withdraw the offer on the basis that the “subject to” conditions have not been fulfilled? 
Insights
Apr 30, 2026
Employment Rights Act 2025: Consultations, NDAs and TUPE in focus
Following on (mostly) from the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA), the government has this month introduced consultations, calls for evidence and guidelines.
Insights
Apr 30, 2026
Improving the building control process for Category A and B work on higher-risk buildings
In this article, first published in PLC Construction, Katharine Tulloch considers the government's consultation on proposals to improve the proportionality of the building control process for Category A and Category B building work on existing higher-risk buildings.