London

London

Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Governor’s House
5 Laurence Pountney Hill
London, EC4R 0BR
United Kingdom

Get Directions

Located in one of the world’s key financial, business and commercial property centres, our London office is home to nearly 700 lawyers who act on complex projects for over 30 FTSE 100 companies and more than 50 Global Fortune 500 companies, providing quality, full-service legal advice in the City, throughout the UK and worldwide.

Those cross-border projects, touching 130 countries, are delivered in close co-ordination with our other offices around the globe, and via a network of over 100 market-leading law firms in jurisdictions throughout the world.

700

Nearly 700 lawyers who act on complex projects

30

Number of the top 50 banks in the world that we represent.

35%

Percentage of the Fortune 500 that rely on our firm to support their business goals and protect their interests.

Our legal work for clients in many areas has seen our firm become a top twenty law firm by London revenues. Areas such as:

  • Real Estate
  • Finance
  • Corporate Finance
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Tax
  • Regulatory
  • Commercial
  • Employment
  • Competition
  • Restructuring
  • Energy and many more disciplines

In London, we work with a number of schools, colleges and not-for-profit organisations to provide opportunities, skills training and advice to young people from age 5 to 18 aimed at raising aspirations,  giving  the students an insight into the world of work and helping them to develop essential skills. 

We have since 2007 been working with Manor Stratford Primary, a school in one of the city’s most disadvantaged boroughs, including running a weekly volunteer reading scheme, annual ‘world of work’ days at our office, sponsoring and helping to deliver an enterprise programme and helping to subsidise the cost of school trips.

Career Kick Start is our annual two week social mobility work experience programme, designed to provide 20 Year 12 students (aged 16-17) from non-advantaged backgrounds with a detailed understanding of life as a commercial lawyer.  The first week of the programme is spent at BCLP in a mix of work shadowing, skills workshops and insight sessions.  The second week is run in partnership with the Social Mobility Business Partnership, and the students participate in a series of one-day insight days, each hosted by a different BCLP client.  We pay all participants the London Living Wage for the duration of the programme.

We are members of Young Enterprise, the UK's leading business and enterprise education charity.  We host the annual regional finals of their flagship Companies Programme and volunteers from BCLP and our clients also volunteer to help deliver Young Enterprise programmes in  schools and colleges, including CV and interview skills masterclasses.

We are long term supporters of East End Community Foundation, and are one of the funders of EECF’s Life Chances Fund, an innovative multi-borough giving scheme that funds frontline organisations and community groups to provide essential support to enrich the lives of residents across the East End.

In our UK offices, we run regular Donate Our Time (“DOT”) days, combining workgroup teambuilding with volunteering in the community, in a variety of ways - including working with food poverty charities and creating and maintaining community open spaces.  We are always happy to organise joint BCLP/client DOT days. 

We have an active charity fundraising programme.  Through an internal nomination and selection process, our UK offices choose a charity to support each year.  For 2024, our UK charity of the year is Mummy’s Star, whose vision is for everyone diagnosed with cancer in and around pregnancy to be able to access support free of charge, in a timely manner.  In addition to running events and challenges in aid of our Charity of the Year, we also run fundraising events and collections in kind for other charities, tackling issues such as access to justice and food poverty.

Jinal Shah

UK Office Managing Partner, London

+44 (0) 20 3400 1000

Jinal Shah

UK Office Managing Partner, London

+44 (0) 20 3400 1000

Meet The Team

Jinal Shah

UK Office Managing Partner, London

+44 (0) 20 3400 1000

Related Insights

Insights
Jun 26, 2024

General Election 2024: how do the Planning manifestos compare?

This Insight summarises the Planning aspirations of the Conservative, Labour and the Liberal Democrat manifestos for the UK’s 2024 election. Their shared focus is on housing, energy infrastructure and battling climate change. The Conservatives remain committed to the Green Belt and maximising brownfield and densification. Labour proposes new towns and increased use of compulsory purchase, with release of ‘grey’ belt. The Lib Dems focus on more localised strategies. Labour and the Conservatives both propose increases in offshore wind, nuclear and carbon capture, use and storage. Both resist fracking. Labour proposes new Government energy investment institutions. The Conservatives remain wary of onshore wind. The Lib Dems support nature-based solutions to the energy crisis given the imperative to tackle global warming.
Insights
Jun 24, 2024

The DMCCA: taking a closer look at the impact on subscription contracts

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA) has recently received royal assent, following the announcement of the July General Election. We examine the key developments in our previous article. One very significant area of focus in the DMCCA (following the UK Government's 2021 consumer protection consultation and the earlier Penrose report) is subscription contracts. Subscription contracts are big business, with estimated consumer spending in the UK on subscriptions said to be between £28 billion and £34 billion a year across multiple sectors, with 8 in 10 UK consumers having at least one subscription. The reforms in the DMCCA were prompted by concerns that consumers may be spending as much as £1.8 billion per year on subscriptions they do not think are good value for money and can find difficult to exit when they no longer require the relevant goods/services.  The new rules are expected to come into force towards the end of 2024, once regulations are passed.
Insights
Jun 20, 2024

Labour’s proposed employment law reforms: our first weekly pre-election guide

Following last week's insight, "Labour's manifesto and employment law - what can employers expect?", we focus this week on the specific issue of removing qualifying periods and increasing statutory time limits.
Insights
Jun 20, 2024

Significant implications for environmental assessment of major projects

The Supreme Court’s judgment in R(Finch) v Surrey County Council  [2024] UKSC 20 has potentially significant implications on how environmental impacts of major projects are assessed.  The question at the heart of the case was how far ‘downstream’ from a development project the decision-maker has to look when assessing its likely environmental effects.  The answer, according to a slim majority of the Supreme Court, is further than had previously been thought necessary.  However, it’s not panic stations for all EIA development.

Related Insights

News
Jun 27, 2024
BCLP plays key role in launching historic Stonewall project
Awards
Jun 27, 2024
BCLP recognized in Chambers Crisis & Risk Management Global-wide ESG Risk (Law Firms) 2024
Insights
Jun 26, 2024
General Election 2024: how do the Planning manifestos compare?
This Insight summarises the Planning aspirations of the Conservative, Labour and the Liberal Democrat manifestos for the UK’s 2024 election. Their shared focus is on housing, energy infrastructure and battling climate change. The Conservatives remain committed to the Green Belt and maximising brownfield and densification. Labour proposes new towns and increased use of compulsory purchase, with release of ‘grey’ belt. The Lib Dems focus on more localised strategies. Labour and the Conservatives both propose increases in offshore wind, nuclear and carbon capture, use and storage. Both resist fracking. Labour proposes new Government energy investment institutions. The Conservatives remain wary of onshore wind. The Lib Dems support nature-based solutions to the energy crisis given the imperative to tackle global warming.
News
Jun 24, 2024
BCLP supports Ipsos in an original investment program for its managers within a listed environment
Insights
Jun 24, 2024
Briefcase 2024 quarter 2: key real estate cases and updates
Insights
Jun 24, 2024
The DMCCA: taking a closer look at the impact on subscription contracts
The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCCA) has recently received royal assent, following the announcement of the July General Election. We examine the key developments in our previous article. One very significant area of focus in the DMCCA (following the UK Government's 2021 consumer protection consultation and the earlier Penrose report) is subscription contracts. Subscription contracts are big business, with estimated consumer spending in the UK on subscriptions said to be between £28 billion and £34 billion a year across multiple sectors, with 8 in 10 UK consumers having at least one subscription. The reforms in the DMCCA were prompted by concerns that consumers may be spending as much as £1.8 billion per year on subscriptions they do not think are good value for money and can find difficult to exit when they no longer require the relevant goods/services.  The new rules are expected to come into force towards the end of 2024, once regulations are passed.
News
Jun 20, 2024
33 BCLP lawyers recognized in Best Lawyers in the UK ranking 2025
Insights
Jun 20, 2024
Labour’s proposed employment law reforms: our first weekly pre-election guide
Following last week's insight, "Labour's manifesto and employment law - what can employers expect?", we focus this week on the specific issue of removing qualifying periods and increasing statutory time limits.
Insights
Jun 20, 2024
Significant implications for environmental assessment of major projects
The Supreme Court’s judgment in R(Finch) v Surrey County Council  [2024] UKSC 20 has potentially significant implications on how environmental impacts of major projects are assessed.  The question at the heart of the case was how far ‘downstream’ from a development project the decision-maker has to look when assessing its likely environmental effects.  The answer, according to a slim majority of the Supreme Court, is further than had previously been thought necessary.  However, it’s not panic stations for all EIA development.